期刊文献+

三种不同麻醉方式对小儿术后躁动的影响 被引量:4

Effect of Three Different Ways of Anesthesia on Postoperative Agitation in Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]比较瑞芬太尼加异丙酚全凭静脉麻醉、七氟醚吸入麻醉、静吸复合麻醉三种不同麻醉方式对小儿术后躁动的影响.[方法]将60例2~5岁实施腺样体切除的患儿随机分为三组(每组20例).瑞芬太尼加异丙酚全凭静脉组(P 组)、七氟醚组(S组)、静吸复合组(R 组),术后送入术后复苏室(PACU).观察各组的躁动发生率、苏醒时间和PACU停留时间.[结果]P组和R组的躁动发生率显著低于S 组(20%和35% vs 70%,P〈0.01).与R组比较,P组、S组的苏醒时间明显延长(P〈0.01或P〈0.05);PACU停留时间亦显著增加(P〈0.01或P〈0.05).[结论]瑞芬太尼加异丙酚全静脉麻醉可有效的抑制小儿术后躁动的发生率,但是联合七氟醚吸入麻醉可以得到更好的苏醒质量. [Objective]To compare the effect of total intravenous anesthesia(TIVA) with remifentanil and propofol vs inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane vs intravenous-inhaled anesthesia on postoperative agitation in children. [Methods]Totally 60 pediatric patients(aged 2 - 5 years old) undergoing adenoidectomy were randomly divided into TIVA with propofol and remifentanil group(group P, n = 20), inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane group(group S, n = 20) and intravenous-inhaled anesthesia(group R, n = 20). All patients were sent into post-anesthesia ICU(PACU) after the surgery. The incidence of agitation, awakening time and stay time in PACU in three groups were observed. [Results]The incidence of agitation in group P and group R was significantly lower than that in group S(20% and 35% vs 70%, P 〈0.01). Compared with group R, the a- wakening time of group P and group S was prolonged obviously( P 〈0. 01 or P 〈0.05). The stay time in PACU of group P and group S also increased( P 〈0.01 or P 〈0.05). [ConclusionlTIVA with remifentanil and propofol can effectively decrease the incidence of postoperative agitation in children, but intravenous-inhaled anesthesia with propofol and sevoflurane can achieve better awakening quality.
作者 于菲 陈卫民
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2012年第4期666-667,671,共3页 Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 情绪障碍 麻醉 Mood disorders anesthesia
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Keaney A, Diviney D, Harte S, et al. Postoperative behavior al changes following anesthesia with sevoflurane[J]. Paediatr Anaesth ,2004,14(10) :866-870.
  • 2Cole JW, Murray DJ, McAllister JD, et al . Emergence be haviour in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia[J]. Paediatr Anaesth , 2002, 12(5) :442-447.
  • 3吴志兰.40例小儿麻醉苏醒期的特点分析[J].苏州大学学报(医学版),2006,26(3):531-531. 被引量:10
  • 4Vlajkovic GP, Sindjelic RP. Emergence delirium in children: many questions, few answers [J]. Anesth Analg , 2007,104 (1): 84-91.
  • 5Saringcarinkul A, Manehupong S, Punjasawadwong Y. Inci- dence and risk factors of emergence agitation in pediatric patients after general anesthesia[J]. J Med Assoc Thai , 2008,91 (8) :1226- 1231.
  • 6Feehner J, Hering W, Ihmsen H, et al . Modelling the phar- macodynamic interaction between remifentanil and propo{ol by EEG-controlled dosing[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol , 2003,20 (5) : 373-379.
  • 7Shibata S, Shigeomi S, Sato W, et al . Nitrous oxide adminis- tration during washout of sevoflurane improves postanesthetie agitation in children[J]. J Anesth ,2005,19(2) : 160-163.
  • 8Hoymork SC, Raeder J, Grimsmo B, et al . Bispectral index, predicted and measured drug levels of target-controlled infu- sions of remifentanil and propofol during laparoscopic cholecys teetomy and emergenee[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ,2000,44 (9) : 1138-1144.
  • 9ScheuIler KM, Zentner J. Total intravenous anesthesia for in- traoperative monitoring 05 the motor pathways: an integral view combining clinical and experimental data:an integral view combining clinical and experimental data[J]. J Neurosurg , 2002,96(3) :571- 579.

二级参考文献2

  • 1孟庆云 柳顺锁.小儿麻醉学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.406-407.
  • 2刘俊杰 赵俊.现代麻醉学[M](第二版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.295.

共引文献9

同被引文献34

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

;
使用帮助 返回顶部