1Glaseppe M. Early results and review of the literature of a novel hy- brid surgical technique combining cervical arthrodesis and disc ar- throplasty for treating multilevel degenerative disc disease: opposite or complementary teehniques[J] Eur Spine,2009(18): 29-39.
2Gore DR, Sepie SB. Anterior diseeetomy and fusion for painful cer- vical disc disease. A report of 50 patients with an average follow-up of 21 years[J]. Spine, 1998, 23 : 2047-2051.
3Shin DA, Yi S, Yoon DH, et al. Artificial disc replacement com- bined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level dis- ease[J]. Spine,2009,34(11): 1153-1159.
4Bono C, Lee C. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome[J]. Spine,2004,29:455-463.
5Goffin J, Geusens E, Vantomme N. Long- term follow- up after interbody fusionofthe cervical spine[J].J Spinal DisordTech, 2004,17(2): 79-85.
6Hilibrand AS, Carlson GD, Palumbo MA, et al. Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cer- vical arthrodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 1999, 81(4): 519-528.
