期刊文献+

批判实在论对社会科学方法论贡献探析 被引量:2

Exploration of the Contribution of Critical Realism to the Methodology of Social Sciences
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从本体论、认识论和方法三个方面探析了批判实在论对社会科学方法论的贡献。它把社会实在的基本特征概括为分层与超验性、突现性和社会结构的能动转化性三个方面。在此基础上它探讨了"认识谬误"的实质、根源和后果,从知识论、因果关系解释论和科学研究程序等方面阐述一种新的认识论。其方法贡献主要集中在回溯法、水平与垂直因果关系解释法和社会行动转化模型三个方面。它批判了在社会科学方法论中实证主义与解释主义的两极张力,从五个方面克服它们各自的二分法缺陷。批判实在论方兴未艾,面对学术界的一些质疑,还有许多问题有待于进一步研究。 This paper explores the contribution of critical realism to the methodology of social sciences from ontology,epistemology and method. The basic characteristics of social reality can be summarized in three aspects: stratification andtranscendence, emergence and active transformation of social structure. Critical realism explores the essence, sources andconsequences of epistemic fallacy and illuminates a new epistemology in terms of the theory of knowledge, the theory of causalexplanations and the procedure of scientific study. Its contribution to methods mainly lies in retroduction, horizontal-verticalexplanation of causation and transformational model of social activity. It criticizes the tension between positivism andhermeneuticism in the methodology of social sciences and overcomes their dichotomy in five aspects. Critical realism is flourishing.It should be studied further as there are questionings from the academic circle.
作者 马国旺
出处 《自然辩证法通讯》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期19-24,125,共6页 Journal of Dialectics of Nature
基金 国家社科基金项目(08BJL009)资助
关键词 批判实在论 社会科学方法论 本体论 认识论 方法 Critical realism Methodology of social sciences Ontology Epistemology Method
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Archer, Margaret, Bhaskar, Roy, Collier, Andrew, Lawson, Tony, Norrie, Man. Critical Realism. Essential Read/ngs[M]. London; New York. Routledge, 1998.
  • 2Bhaskar, Roy. A Realist Theory of Science[M]. 3ed. London; New York. Verso, 2008.
  • 3Creaven, Sean. Emergentist Marxism. Dialectical Philosophy and Soc/a/Theory[M]. London; New York. Routledge, 2007, 14.
  • 4Bhaskar, Roy. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation[M]. london; New York. Routledge, 2009.
  • 5Bhaskar, Roy. D/a/ect/c. The Pu/se of Freedom[M]. London and New York. Routledge, 2008.
  • 6Lawson, Tony. Reorienting Economics[M]. London and New York. Roufledge, 2003.
  • 7Bhaskar, Roy. The Possibility of Naturalism. a Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sc/ences[M] London; New York. Routledge, 1998.
  • 8托尼·劳森.回到现实[A],爱德华·富布鲁克.经济学的危机[c],贾根良等译,北京.高等教育出版社出版,2004,131-133.
  • 9马国旺.批判实在论增进马克思经济学方法论的创新之我见[J].经济学家,2010(4):22-30. 被引量:3
  • 10马国旺.抽象的方法论:从马克思纲领到批判实在论新发展评析[J].社会科学战线,2009(8):70-76. 被引量:5

二级参考文献24

  • 1杨学功.马克思主义哲学与“本体论”研究:分歧与出路[J].哲学研究,2001(9):9-15. 被引量:13
  • 2贾根良.中国经济学革命论[J].社会科学战线,2006(1):56-71. 被引量:40
  • 3《保卫马克思》,北京:商务印书馆,1984年.
  • 4安德鲁·布朗等.《批判实在论与马克思主义》,陈静等译,南宁:广西师范大学出版社,2007年,第38页.
  • 5R Bhaskar, The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences ( 2nd edition), london : Harvester, 1989, p. 133.
  • 6T. Lawson, Economics and Reality, London: Routledge, 1997, p. 208.
  • 7Berth Danermark, Mats Ekstrom, Liselotte Jakobsen and Jan Ch. Karlsson, Explaining Society: Critical Realism in the Social Sciences, London : Routledge, 2002, pp. 130 - 133.
  • 8诺曼·K·邓津,伊冯娜·S·林肯主编.《定性研究:策略与艺术》,风笑天等译,重庆:重庆大学出版社,2007年,第550-554页.
  • 9Berth Danermark, Mats Ekstrom, Liselotte Jakobsen and Jan Ch. Karlsson, Explaining Society: CriticalRealism in the Social Sciences, London : Routledge, 2002, p. 77.
  • 10诺曼·K·邓津,伊冯娜·S·林肯.定性研究:策略与艺术[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2007:611-637.

同被引文献34

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部