期刊文献+

美国业余体育领域性别歧视的法律规制——以《教育法》修正案第9章为例 被引量:6

Regulation of Gender Discrimination in U.S. Amateur Sports——In View of Title IX of Education Amendments
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国《教育法》修正案第9章禁止接受联邦资助机构中的性别歧视行为,公立学校体育活动也属于其规制范围,其是否存在性别歧视共有3项标准进行检验。在业余体育具体适用第9章条款的过程中,法院的判例起着重要的推动作用。体育领域与第9章有关的案件主要有4种类型。 There should be no gender discrimination in the agencies receiving federal financial assistance by the Ti tle IX of the Education Amendments in the U.S,which includes public schools.There are three standards to test whether there exist gender discrimination.The court plays an important role in promoting the application of Title IX in amateur sports.The cases related to amateur sports can be divided into four types.
作者 周青山
机构地区 湘潭大学法学院
出处 《武汉体育学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期42-47,共6页 Journal of Wuhan Sports University
基金 湖南省社会科学基金项目"体育领域反歧视法律问题研究(11YBB340)"
关键词 业余体育 性别歧视 教育法 法律规制 amateur sports gender discrimination Education Act regulation
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Grove City College v. Bell[Z]. 465 U. S. 555 (1984).
  • 2Glenn M. Essentials of Sports Law [M]. 4th ed., California: Praeger Publishers, 2009: 323.
  • 3Deborah Brake. The Struggle For Sex Equality in Sport and the Theory Behind Title IX [J]. University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform,2000-2001, 34: 46-59.
  • 4Lisa Yonka Stevens. The Sports of Numbers: Manipulating Ti- tle IX to Rational Discrimination Against Women[J]. B. Y. U. Education And Law Journal, 2004( 1 ) : 171-189.
  • 5Sue Ann Mota. Title IX After Thirty-four Years--Retaliation is not Allowed According to the Supreme Court in Jackson v. Bir- mingham Board of Education[J]. ViUanova Sports & Entertain- ment Law Journal, 2006, 13 : 254-257.
  • 6NCAA v. Smith[Z]. 525 U. S. 459 (1999).
  • 7Matthew P. Determining Whether the National Coolegiate Ath- letic Association is a Recipient of Federal Funds Under Title IX [ J ]. Missouri Law Review, 2000,65 : 773-784.
  • 8Othen v. Ann Arbor School Board[Z]. 507 F. Supp. 1376 (E. D. Mich. 1981), aff'd., 699 F.2d 309 (6th Cir. 1983).
  • 9Haffer v. Temple University[Z]. 524 F. Supp. 531 (E. D. Pa. 1981), aff'd. , 688 F. 2d 14 (3rd Cir. 1982).
  • 10Cannon v. University of Chicago[Z]. 441 U. S. 677 (1979).

二级参考文献1

共引文献26

同被引文献42

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部