期刊文献+

基于模糊Bow-tie模型的深水海底管道定量风险评价研究 被引量:31

Quantitative Risk Assessment of Deepwater Submarine Pipeline Based on Fuzzy Bow-tie Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为有效评价深水海底管道风险,提出一种新的模糊Bow-tie模型定量风险评价方法。综合运用Bow-tie图、模糊集以及德尔菲法,定量分析油气泄漏概率。进一步利用层次分析法(AHP)研究油气泄漏后果的严重程度,给出泄漏后果因素的权重系数选择方案。同时,结合风险矩阵,实现对高风险深水海底管道的定量风险评价。将上述方法用到具体海底管道工程中,得出目标海底管道泄漏概率属于A级,泄漏后果属于Ⅲ级,泄漏风险为高风险,这一结果与实际情况较为符合。 In order to effectively assess risk of deepwater submarine pipeline,a new quantitative risk assessment method based on fuzzy bow-tie model,was therefore proposed.Firstly,leakage possibility of oil/gas was quantitatively analyzed using Bow-tie model,Fuzzy Sets and Delphi method.Moreover,leakage consequence was analyzed by analytic hierarchy process,and weighting coefficients of consequence-influencing factors were obtained.Accordingly,quantitative risk assessment was completed by risk matrix.In the end,the above-mentioned assessment method was applied to a certain submarine pipeline.Leakage possibility level of target submarine pipeline belongs to A and leakage consequence level,III,and risk level,high,agreeing well with the reality.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期128-133,共6页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 国家科技重大专项子课题(2011ZX05027-005-001) "863"计划重点项目(2012AA09A205)
关键词 海底管道 定量风险评价 模糊Bow-tie模型 层次分析法(AHP) 风险矩阵 submarine pipeline quantitative risk assessment fuzzy bow-tie model analytic hierarchy process(AHP) risk matrix
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1W. Kent Muhlbauer. Pipeline Risk Management Manual(2^nd Edition)[M]. Burlington, USA: Gulf Professional Publish- ing, 1996 : 335 - 363.
  • 2DNV-RP-F107, Risk Assessment of Pipeline Protection[S]. 2001.
  • 3DNV-RP-F206, Riser Integrity Assessment[ S]. 2008.
  • 4Yong Bai ,Qiang Bai. Subsea Pipelines and Risers[M]. Oxford, UK,2005:685 -749.
  • 5张华兵,冯庆善,郑洪龙,税碧垣.油气长输管道定量风险评价[J].中国安全科学学报,2008,18(3):161-165. 被引量:39
  • 6Ching-Torng Lin,Mao-Jiun J Wang. Hybrid fault tree analysis using fuzzy sets[J]. Reliability Engineering and Safety Sys- tem, 1997,58(3) :205 -213.
  • 7Clemen R T, Winkler R L. Combing probability distribution from experts in risk analysis [J]. Risk Analysis, 1999, 19(2) : 187 - 293.
  • 8Shu-Jen Chen,Cing-Lai Hwang, Frank P Hwang. Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications[M]. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992:138 - 150.
  • 9Onisawa T. An approach to human reliability in man-machine systems using error possibility[J]. Fuzzy Sets and System, 1988,27(2) :87 - 103.

二级参考文献11

共引文献38

同被引文献235

引证文献31

二级引证文献187

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部