期刊文献+

供体年龄对活体肾移植预后的影响 被引量:2

Effect of donor age on prognosis of riving donor kidney transplantation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨供体年龄对活体肾移植预后的影响。方法回顾性分析2004年至2011年间在我院实施的活体亲属肾移植217例,按供体年龄或供受体年龄差异分组,随访并比较各组受者的血肌酐水平和术后并发症情况。结果随着供体年龄的增长,受体移植术后血肌酐水平呈上升趋势。与供受体年龄差〈-5岁组比较,供体年龄差〉5岁组的Ser水平在1个月[(143.5±42.1)μmol/L比(114.4±30.4)μmol/L]、3个月[(139.9±36.6)μmol/L比(110.6±33.3)μmol/L1、1年1(132.1±22.1)μmol/L比(105.5±35.9)μmol/L1及2年(132.0±45.4)μmol/L比(97.2±17.5)μmol/L]均增高,差异有统计学意义(均P〈0.05)。与年轻供肾组(〈50岁)相比,老年供肾组(〉50岁)的急性排斥反应发生率(19.4%比9.7%)和慢性排斥反应发生率(9.7%比1.4%)也显著增高(均P〈0.05)。术后人及肾的存活率比较差异无统计学意义。供受体年龄差异是术后2年Scr水平异常的独立危险因素(OR=5.010,P〈0.05)。结论供体年龄是肾移植预后的重要影响因素,老年供肾的疗效较差。 Objective To assess the impact of donor age on the outcome of living donor kidney transplantation. Methods A total of 217 patients undergoing living donor kidney transplantation during 2004 to 2011 were enrolled in our retrospective study. The recipients were divided into different groups according to their donors' age or the age gaps between donors and recipients. A follow-up survey was conducted to evaluate the serum creatinine level and the incidence of comphcations after transplantation. Results As the donors age grew, the recipients' serum creatinine increased. The serum creatinine levels of patients with older donors(age gap〉5 years) at 1 month[(143.5±42.1) μmol/L vs (114.4±30.4) μmol/L], 3 months (139.9±36.6) μmol/L vs (110.6±33.3) μmol/L], 1 year [(132.1±22.1)μmol/L vs (105.5±35.9) Ixmol/L] and 2 years (132.0±45.4) μmol/L vs (97.2±17.5) μmol/L] after operation were significantly higher than those with younger donors(age gap〈-5)(P〈0.05). The incidence of acute rejection (19.4% vs 9.7%, P〈0105) and chronic rejection (9.7% vs 1.4%, P〈0.05) was significantly higher in the group with donors older than 50 years old than those with donors younger than 50 years old. But no significant difference was observed in the survival of the grafts or the recipients. Age gap between the donor and recipient was an independent risk factor for abnormal serum creatinine level at 2 years after transplantation (OR=5.010, P〈0.05). Conclusions Donor age is an important impact factor on the outcome of living donor kidney transplantation. Recipients of older living donation have poorer prognosis.
出处 《中华肾脏病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期455-459,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nephrology
关键词 肾移植 活体供者 年龄因素 移植物排斥 Kidney transplantation Living donors Age factors Graft rejection
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Noppakun K, Cosio FG, Dean PG, et al. Living donor age and kidney transplant outcomes. Am J Transplant, 2011, 11: 1279-1286.
  • 2Jain N, Airy M, Kumari P, et al. Significant decrease in glomerular filtration rate at 5 years posttransplantation in therecipients of live donor kidneys 50 years of age or older. Transplant Proc, 2010, 42: 1648-1653.
  • 3Kim JM, Kim S J, Joh JW, et al. Is it safe to use a kidney from an expanded criteria donor? Transplant Proc, 2011, 43: 2359-2362.
  • 4陈立中,张磊,费继光,王长希,邱江,邓素雄,李军,陈国栋,黄刚,傅茜.50岁以上活体亲属供肾移植的中期疗效分析[J].器官移植,2010,1(1):45-49. 被引量:14
  • 5陈立中,陈国栋,王长希,费继光,邱江,邓素雄,李军.尸肾移植1806例效果分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(3):166-170. 被引量:14
  • 6Lamb KE, Lodhi S, Meier-Kriesche HU. Long-term renal allograft survival in the United States: a critical reappraisal. Am J Transplant, 2011, 11: 450-462.
  • 7Scolari MP, Cappuccilli ML, Lanci N, et al. Predictive factors in chronic allograft nephropathy. Transplant Proc, 2005, 37: 2482-2484.
  • 8Dominquez J, Lira F, Rebolledo R, et al. Duration of delayed graft function is an important predictor of 1-year serum creatinine. Transplant Proc, 2009, 41: 131-132.
  • 9Di Cocco P, Orlando G, Rizza V, et al. Kidney transplantation from older donors. Transplant Proc, 2011, 43: 1033-1035.
  • 10Velosa JA, Offord KP, Schroeder DR. Effects of age, sex and glomerular filtration rate on renal function outcome of living kidney donors. Transplantation, 1995, 60: 1618-1621.

二级参考文献56

  • 1朱同玉.亲属活体肾移植中应注意的几个问题[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2006,15(1):49-50. 被引量:22
  • 2黄刚,陈立中,王长希,费继光,邱江,傅茜,李军,邓素雄,陈国栋.标准HLA配型与氨基酸残基配型在再次肾移植中的应用[J].中山大学学报(医学科学版),2007,28(2):196-200. 被引量:1
  • 3Kassiske BL, Snyder J, Matas AT, et al. The impact of transplantation on survival with kidney failure. Clin Transpl, 2000, 135-143.
  • 4Moreso F, Seron D, Gil-Verent S, et al. Donor age and delayed graft function as predictor of renal allograft survival in rejection free patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1999, 14: 930-935.
  • 5Kerr SR, Gillingham KJ, Johnson EM, et al. Living donors > 55 years: to use or not to use? Transplantation, 1999, 67: 999-1004.
  • 6Matas AJ, Payne WD, Sutherland DE, et al. 2,500 living donor kidney transplants: a single-center experience. Ann Surg, 2001, 234 : 149-164.
  • 7de Fijter JW, Mallat MJ, Doxiadis II, et al. Increased immunogenicity and cause of graft loss of old donor kidneys. J Am Soc Nephrol, 2001, 12 : 1538-1546.
  • 8Seron D, Carrera M, Grino JM, et al. Relationship between donor renal interstitial surface and post-transplant function. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 1993, 8:539-543.
  • 9Curschellas E, Landmann J, Durig M, et al. Morphologic findings in "zero-hour" biopsies of renal transplants. Clin Nephrol, 1991, 36 : 215-222.
  • 10Epstein M. Aging and the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol, 1996, 7: 1106-1122.

共引文献28

同被引文献31

  • 1陈正,潘光辉,廖德怀,等.老年活体亲属供肾移植的安全性分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2008,29(1):21-25.
  • 2EL-SHEIKH A A,KOENDERINK J B,WOUTERSE AC, et al. Renal glucuronidation and multidrug resistance protein 2-/ multi- drug resistance protein 4-mediated efflux of mycophenolic acid : in- teraction with cyclosporine and tacrolimus[J]. Transl Res, 2014 , 164(1):46-56.
  • 3BROWN N W, AW M M, MILEI-VERGANI G, et al. Mycophe- nolic acid and mycophenolic acid glucuronide pharmacokinetics in pediatric liver transplant recipients : effect of cyclosporine and ta- crolimus comedication[J]. Ther Drug Monit,2002,24(1):598-606.
  • 4MOHAMMADPUR A H, NAZEMIAN F,ABTAHI B,et al. Influ- ence of renal graft function on mycophenolic acid pharmacokinetics during the early period after kidney transplant[J]. Exp Clin Trans- plant, 2008,6(4):276-281.
  • 5XIA Z W, JUN C Y,HAO C,et al. The occurrence of diarrhea not related to the pharmacokinetics of MPA and its metabolites in liver transplant patients[J]. Eur J Clin Pharmacol,2010,66(7):671-679.
  • 6张磊,马麟麟,马斌荣,田野.活体肾脏移植供者年龄和性别对术后早期发生急性排斥反应的影响[J].中华医学杂志,2008,88(48):3407-3410. 被引量:5
  • 7李定云,叶启发,明英姿,成柯,赵于军,朱利军,佘兴国,牛英.老龄活体供肾移植55例[J].实用医学杂志,2010,26(1):53-55. 被引量:5
  • 8郭丰富,邵志强,杨文彦,王广健,谭善峰,何相飞.供者年龄>50岁的亲属活体供肾移植[J].山东医药,2010,50(10):20-21. 被引量:1
  • 9陈立中,张磊,费继光,王长希,邱江,邓素雄,李军,陈国栋,黄刚,傅茜.50岁以上活体亲属供肾移植的中期疗效分析[J].器官移植,2010,1(1):45-49. 被引量:14
  • 10王宣传,许明,朱同玉,戎瑞明,唐群业,孙立安,王国民.60岁以上供肾亲属肾移植临床疗效分析[J].复旦学报(医学版),2010,37(3):336-338. 被引量:6

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部