期刊文献+

科研立项和评奖应实行问责制 被引量:1

Accountability System Should Be Applied in Scientific Research Project and Awards
下载PDF
导出
摘要 如今学术已卷入了利益的漩涡,论文、著作、课题、成果等等都与地位和利益相挂钩,为了地位和利益,论文、著作、课题、成果等领域的造假也就屡屡发生了。何以如此呢?原因一定很多,也可能很深,但是缺少责任追究一定是重要原因之一。鉴于此,为了遏制学术腐败,维护学术的清洁和神圣,在科研立项和评奖方面应该实行问责制。 Now the academic already involved in the vortex of interests, so the papers, works andissues, results, and so the papers, works and but lack of responsihili maintain the cleanness alld awards aspects. on, have hung up the hook of status and in issues, results in the field is ongoing. Why terests. In order to position and interests, the fraud of so? Reason must be a lot, and also may be very deep, ty must be one of the important reasons. In view of this, in order to curb the academic corruption, of academic and sacred, the accountability system should implement In the scientific research project
作者 常存库
出处 《医学与哲学(A)》 北大核心 2012年第5期12-14,共3页 Medicine & Philosophy:Humanistic & Social Medicine Edition
关键词 科研立项 问责制 学术腐败 责任追究 利益 论文 著作 scientific research project, achievement awards, accountability system
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献4

共引文献17

同被引文献24

  • 1戴国庆,李丽亚.国外科技项目绩效考评研究与借鉴[J].中国科技论坛,2005(5):45-48. 被引量:56
  • 2周寄中,杨列勋,许治.关于国家自然科学基金管理科学部资助项目后评估的研究[J].管理评论,2007,19(3):13-19. 被引量:26
  • 3吴今培,李学伟.系统科学发展概论[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2010(4).
  • 4李栋亮.委托代理视角下的科技项目管理问题研究[J].科学学研究,2007,25(5):915-918. 被引量:14
  • 5DEMERITT D. The new social contract for science: accountability,relevance, and value in us and UK science and research policy[J]. Antipode,2002,32(3) :308- 329.
  • 6EBRAHIM A. Placing the normative logics of accounlability in " thick" perspective[J]. American Behavioral Scientist,2009,52(6) :885 -904.
  • 7BOVENS M. Analyzing and assessing public accountability: a conceptual framework [J]. European Law Journal, 2007,13(4) :447-468.
  • 8ROSALIE RUEGG, FELLER I. A toolkit for evaluating public R&D investment models, methods, and findings from ATP' s first decade[J]. Gaithersburg: MD National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2003:7.
  • 9SOHN SY,GYU JOO Y,KYU HAN H. Structural equa tion model for the evaluation of national funding on R&D project of SMEs in consideration with MBNQA criteria[J]. Evaluation and Program Planning,2007,30(1) :10 -20.
  • 10REVILLA E, SARKIS J, MODREGO A. Evaluating performance of public-private research collaborations: a DEA analysis[J]. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 2003,54(2) :165- 174.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部