期刊文献+

中国科学:增长的极限与生命科学的进步——2011年SCI论文统计分析 被引量:7

China's Science:The Limits to Growth and Great Strides in Life Sciences Field——Statistics and Analysis of SCI-indexed Paper in 2011
原文传递
导出
摘要 该报告利用文献计量学方法以SCI数据库为统计源对中国科学的整体表现做了分析,结果表明:2011年中国科学的综合得分首超日本,跻身于世界五强,与科技发达国家的差距正在逐年缩小。然而生命科学发展水平的滞后是制约中国科学整体提升的短板。可喜的是,中国生命科学作为后起之秀,近10年以年均25%的产出增长率进入了研究规模快速发展的起步阶段。进一步加快生命科学的发展,是实现中国科学全面腾飞的必经之路。 The annual report on the overall analysis of Sciences of China shows that the gap between China and the developed countries in S&T is narrowing year by year. The scores based on SCI data indicate that China surpassed Japan in 2011, and joined the world's top five. However, the Chinese scientific development is facing the "Limits to Growth". The lag of the level of development of Life Sciences is a short board to restrict the whole enhancement of Sciences of China. The average annual output growth rate 25% of the Chinese Life Sciences within 10 years indicates that Chinese Life Sciences are in the initial rapid developing stage based on research scale, The ways to achieve the comprehensive take-off of China Sciences is to accelerate the development of Life Sciences.
出处 《科学观察》 CSSCI 2012年第2期41-70,共30页 Science Focus
关键词 增长的极限 生命科学 文献计量方法 the limits to growth, life sciences, bibliometrical method
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献12

  • 1金碧辉,孙海荣,张望.俯瞰中国科学——2005年度SCI论文统计分析[J].科学观察,2006,1(1):18-40. 被引量:11
  • 2金碧辉,张望,周秋菊.中国科学:前进中的“航母”——2006年SCI论文统计分析[J].科学观察,2007,2(1):20-44. 被引量:10
  • 3World Economic Forum. The global competitiveness report 2010-2011 [R]. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 20! 0.
  • 4世界经济论坛总监:中国排名上升缘于金融市场发展.http://stock.cnstock.com/overseas/jrjd/201009/854098.htm. [2011-1-22].
  • 5Hu X J, Rousseau R. Comparative study of the difference in research performance in biomedical fields among selected Western and Asian countries, Scientometrics, 2009, 81(2):475-491.
  • 6Glanzel W, Debackere K, Meyer M. 'Triad' or 'tetrad' ? On global changes in a dynamic world. Scientometrics, 2008, 74(1):71-88.
  • 7Frame J D. Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean.Interciencia, 1977, 2 : 143-148.
  • 8Kozlowski J, Radosevic S, lrchaD. History matters: the inherited disciplinary structure of the post-communist science in countries of central and Eastern Europe and its restructuring. Scientometrics, 1999, 45(1): 137-166.
  • 9David A K. The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 2004, 430(6): 311-316.
  • 10Liang L M, Havemann F, Heinz M, Wager-Dobler R. Structural similarities between science growth dynamics in China and in western countries. Scientometrics, 2006, 66(2):311-325.

共引文献54

同被引文献73

引证文献7

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部