期刊文献+

美国ACT课程调查对我国高考改革的启示 被引量:3

Focusing on College Entrance Examination Reform: Implications of ACT NCS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国ACT对教授英语/写作、数学、阅读和科学四个内容领域的初中、高中和大学教师定期开展全国课程调查。本文介绍了2009年课程调查的对象、任务、结果和结论。ACT通过课程调查改进考试的做法值得我们借鉴学习,针对高中、大学开展全国高考课程调查,或许能为高考改革找到一个突破口。 The ACT National Curriculum Survey is a survey of educational practices and expectations conducted by ACT. ACT surveys thousands of middle school, high school, and postsecondary teachers in English/writing, reading, mathematics, and science for the purpose of determining what skills and knowledge are currently being taught, and which are considered important for success at each grade level for college readiness. This paper introduces the survey participants, tasks, results and conclusions in 2009. Surveying high school and postsecondary teachers on college entrance examination in China similarly, that may open a window for the reform of college entrance examination.
机构地区 教育部考试中心
出处 《中国考试》 2012年第5期24-29,共6页 journal of China Examinations
关键词 课程调查 高考 改革 高校人才选拔标准 Curriculum Survey College Entrance Examination Reform Criterion for College Entrance
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献32

  • 1李清华.语言测试之效度理论发展五十年[J].现代外语,2006,29(1):87-95. 被引量:93
  • 2Guerrero M. D. The unified validity of the four skills exam: applying Messick' s framework. Language Testing, 2000, 17 (4) : 397 - 421.
  • 3weir c. j. Language Testing and Validation. Palgrave: Macmillan, 2005 : 43 215.
  • 4Wolf M. et al. Validity issues in assessing English language learners' language proficiency. Educational Assessment,2008,13(2-3): 80-107.
  • 5Messick S. Validity. In: R. L. L inn (Ed.) . Educational Measurement. New York: American Council on Education / Macmillan publishing Co. (3rd ed. ) ,1989; 13 - 103.
  • 6Messick S, Validity of psychological assessment. American Psychologist, 1995(9) : 941 - 945.
  • 7AERA, APA, & NCME. Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington, DC: AERA,1999:1- 174.
  • 8Kane M. T. An argument - based approach to validity. Psychological Bulletin, 1992,112 : 527 - 535.
  • 9Kane M. T. Validity. In R. L. L inn ( Ed. ) , Educational Measurement. New York: American Council on Education / Macmillan publishing Co. (4th ed. ) ,2006:17 - 60.
  • 10Kane M. T. Current concerns in validity theory. Journal of Educational Measurement, 2001,38 (4) : 319 - 342.

共引文献52

同被引文献9

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部