期刊文献+

英国刑事相似事实证据规则的新发展--以《2003年刑事审判法》为基点 被引量:2

The New Development of English Criminal Similar Fact Evidence Rule:On the Basis of Criminal Justice Act 2003
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自《2003年刑事审判法》颁布以来,英国刑事相似事实证据规则发生巨大变革。新法将相似事实证据归于不良品格证据项下,并废除了普通法上的相似事实证据规则,改而以类型化的一般相关性为可采性标准,并辅以详尽的采纳程序。这虽然改变了普通法严格的可采性标准,限制了法官的自由裁量权,却大大简化和统一了相似事实证据规则的适用,也促进司法公正的实现。 A great revolution has happened on the English criminal similar fact evidence rule since the publication of Criminal Justice Act 2003.The new act absorbed the similar fact evidence into the bad character evidence,repealed the similar fact evidence rule in the common law,and provided the categorical general correlation as the standard of admissibility with the detailed adoption procedure.These changed the strict standard of admissibility in the common law,and restricted the discretion of judges,but they simplified and unified the application of similar fact evidence rule,and promoted the realization of judicial justice.
作者 陶南颖
出处 《浙江社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期152-154,160,共3页 Zhejiang Social Sciences
关键词 相似事实证据《2003年刑事审判法》发展 Similar Fact Evidence,Criminal Justice Act 2003,Development
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1See Elizabeth A. Martin, Oxford Dictionary of Law, Oxford University Press, 1997, p. 433.
  • 2similar happenings)-See Bryan A. Garner, Black's LawDictionary, 8th edition, West Group, 2007, p. 4316.
  • 3See Lord Justice Auld, Review of the Criminal Courts of England and Wales, The Stationery Office, 2001, p. 567.
  • 4刘宇平.论英国刑事诉讼中的品格证据规则[J].贵州大学学报(社会科学版),2006,24(3):48-53. 被引量:19
  • 5@See The Secretary of State, Criminal Justice Act 2003 (Categories of Offences) Order 2004 (SI2004/3346), http:// www. legislation, gov. uk/uksi.
  • 6See R v. Hanson [2005]2 Cr App R 21.
  • 7See The Criminal Procedure Rule Committee, The Consolidated Criminal Practice Direction, http://www, justice, gov. uk.
  • 8See Office for Criminal Justice Reform, Research into the impact of bad character provisions on the courts, http://www. justice, gov. uk/publications.
  • 9张朝霞,冯英菊.从《所有人的正义》看英国的刑事司法改革[J].法学家,2004(6):133-144. 被引量:4

二级参考文献8

  • 1[1]David p.Leonard.In Defense of the Character Evidence Prohibition:Foundations of the Rule Against Trial by Character[J].Indiana:Indiana Law Journal.,1998
  • 2[2]John N.Langbein.The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2003
  • 3[3]Psul Roberts,Adrian Zuckerman.Criminal Evidence[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2004
  • 4季美君.英国刑事证据法中的品格证据[J].北京:中国刑事法杂志(总第41期),2003,.
  • 5[5]Raymand Emson.Evidence[M].London:Macmillan Press LTD.; 1999
  • 6[7]Richard Taylor.The Criminal Justice Act 2003[M].New York:Oxford University Press,2004
  • 7伯尔曼著.《法律与宗教》[M].生活·读书·新知,三联书店,1991年版.第28页.
  • 8.[EB/OL].http://www.sina.coin.cn,2002年3月14日.

共引文献21

同被引文献21

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部