期刊文献+

基于数量弹性契约的供应链鲁棒运作模型 被引量:1

Robust operation model for supply chain based on quantity flexibility contract
下载PDF
导出
摘要 供应链中的各种不确定性因素造成供应链运作风险,进而影响供应链各成员及其整体绩效水平.利用鲁棒优化方法处理不确定性优化问题的优势及数量弹性契约机制的风险分担功能,研究包含一个制造商和一个销售商的二级供应链系统绩效优化问题,根据Stackelberg博弈理论,在考虑需求不确定条件下,建立了基于数量弹性契约的鲁棒优化模型,提出了区间性需求分布下的鲁棒运作策略,并给出了相关的算例,算例结果表明:具有数量弹性契约的供应链鲁棒运作策略能保证供应链中各成员及整体收益在一定程度上优于没有数量弹性契约时的收益,从而可以提高供应链各成员及其整体的收益. Various uncertainties bring about supply chain risk,thereby affecting its members and the overall performance.Given the nice performance of robust optimization in handling problems with uncertainties,and the advantage of quantity flexibility contract with respect to risk-sharing mechanism,this paper studied a two-stage supply chain system containing one manufacturer and one distributer,established a robust operation model based on the quantity flexibility contract using the Stackelberg game theory,gave the robust strategies under the interval distribution of demand,and verified by an example: the robust strategies under quantity flexibility contract can ensure that the interests of each party are at least better than the profits without,therefore,to some extent improve the benefits of the overall supply chain and its members.
出处 《天津理工大学学报》 2012年第2期78-82,共5页 Journal of Tianjin University of Technology
基金 国家社会科学基金(08BJY004)
关键词 鲁棒优化 数量弹性契约 STACKELBERG博弈 风险分担 不确定性 robust operation quantity flexibility contract Stackelberg game risk-sharing uncertainty
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Wang C X. A general framework of supply chain contract models [ J ]. Supply Chain Management : An International Journal. 2002. 7(5): 302-310.
  • 2Padmanabhan V, Png I P L. Manufacturer's returns policy and retail competition [ J ]. Marketing Science, 1997, 16 (1) : 81-94.
  • 3Dong L, Rudi N. Supply Chain interaction under trans- shipments [ J ]. Management Science, 2004, 50 ( 5 ) : 645- 657.
  • 4Gerard P, Cachon, Martin A, Lariviere. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: strengths and limitations [ J ]. Management Science, 2005, 51 ( 1 ) : 30-44.
  • 5姜波.需求不确定供应链协调契约研究进展[J].中国市场,2007(7):100-101. 被引量:2
  • 6Agrawal V, Seshadri S. Risk intermediation in supply Chains [ J ]. IIE Transactions, 2000 ,32 : 819- 831.
  • 7Tayur S, Ganeshan R, Magazine M. Quantitative models for supply chain management [ M ]. Boston : Kluwer Academic Publishers , 1999 : 299-336.
  • 8Chan F T S, Chan H K. A Simulation study with quantity flexibility in a supply chain subjected to uncertainties[J]. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 2006, 19(2) : 148-160.

二级参考文献8

  • 1[1]Whang,S.Coordination in operations:A taxonomy.Journal of Operations Management,1995,12(3):413 422.
  • 2[2]Tsay,A.,Nahmias,S.,Agrawal,N.Modeling supply chain contracts:A review.In:Tayur,S.,Ganeshan,R.,Magazine,M.(Eds.),QuantitativeModels for Supply Chain Management.Kluwer Academic Publishers,Dordrecht (Chapter 10),1999,1339 1358.
  • 3[3]Tsay,A.A.,Lovejoy,W.S.Quantity.exibility contracts and supply chain performance.Manufacturing and Service Operations Management,1999,1(2):89 111.
  • 4[4]Eppen,G.D.,Iyer,A.V.Backup agreements in fashion buying-the value of upstream.exibility.Management Science,1997,43 (11):1469 1484.
  • 5[5]Emmons,H.,Gilbert,S.M.Note:The role of returns policies in pricing and inventory decisions for catalogue goods.Management Science,1998,44 (2):276 283.
  • 6[6]Lee,H.,Whang,S.Decentralized multi-echelon supply chains:Incentives and information.Management Science,1999,45(5).
  • 7[7]Cachon,G.,Lariviere,M.A.Supply chain coordination with revenue sharing contracts:Strengths and limitations.Working Paper,The Wharton School of Business,University of Pennsylvania,Philadelphia.2000
  • 8[8]Cachon,G.,Lariviere,M.A.Capacity choice and allocation:Strategic behavior and supply chain performance.Management Science,1999,45 (8):1091 1108.

共引文献1

同被引文献42

  • 1张昕瑞,王恒山.供应链鲁棒性作用模型及衡量研究[J].江苏商论,2009(3):116-118. 被引量:2
  • 2邱若臻,黄小原.时滞和参数不确定的供应链动态模型及其鲁棒H_∞控制[J].信息与控制,2007,36(2):240-244. 被引量:12
  • 3罗菲.VBM框架下的价值驱动要素分析[J].发展研究,2007,24(5):96-98. 被引量:5
  • 4黄小原,晏妮娜.供应链鲁棒性问题的研究进展[J].管理学报,2007,4(4):521-528. 被引量:32
  • 5马华士,林勇.供应链管理[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
  • 6洪剑锋.风险调整绩效度量指标(RAPM)与经济增加值(EVA)研究综述[C]//国金融风险经理论坛组委会.风险管理.北京:企业管理出版社,2011.
  • 7MII.I.IKENF J. Three types of perceived uncertainty a- bout the environment: state, effect, and response uncer- tainty[J]. Academy of Management Review,1987,12(1) ; 133-143.
  • 8KRICKXG A. The relationship between uncertainty and vertical integration[J]. International Journal of Organiza- tional Analysis,2000,8(1) :309-329.
  • 9BLACKHURST J, WU T, GRADY P O. Network-based approach to modelling uncertainty in a supply chain[J]. International Journal of Production Research, 2004, 42 (1):1639 1658.
  • 10于鲲鹏.生产型供应链脆弱性若干关键问题研究[D].重庆:重庆大学,2014.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部