不同借包管理模式的效果比较

Effects of different management models for package loaning:a comparative study

目的寻找一种快捷、有利于临床工作和实际操作的借包模式。方法将医院临床科室的借包分3种模式实施,试验组A:2010年9月份所有临床科室的借包由医院外勤队人员负责(外勤队不属于供应中心管理);试验组B:2010年10月份所有临床科室的借包由供应中心负责;对照组:2010年8月份由各科室自行负责借包;比较3种不同借包模式每个借包平均耗费时间、归还天数、急需包借包及时性以及出错率。结果试验组A、B、对照组每个借包平均耗费时间18.28、14.34、20.83 min;归还天数2.53、1.63、2.12 d;急需包借包耗费时间15.79、8.76、19.46 min;出错率5.9%、0、0。结论由供应中心负责各科室的借包模式耗费的时间最少、归还最及时、出错率最低是最能及时满足临床需求的一种借包模式。

OBJECTIVE To look for a quick,favorable and practical model for management package loaning.METHODS We used three models to manage packages in clinical departments.Experimental group A：all packages clinical departments needed were responsible by field team during Sep.2010（field team did not belong to supply center）;experimental group B：all packages were responsible by supply center during Oct.2010;control group：all packages were managed by each clinical department during Aug.2010.Then we compared three models by the average time-consuming each packet,the number of days for return,the timeliness of urgent packet,and the error rate.RESULTS The average time-consuming each packet of experimental group A,B and control group were 18.28 min,14.34 min,and 20.83 min;the duration of days for return was 2.53 days,1.63 days,2.12 days;the time consuming of urgent packet was 15.79 min,8.76 min,and 19.46 min;the error rates were 5.9%,0%,and 0%.CONCLUSION Packages loaning model responsible by supply center is with the least time consuming,the most timely return,the lowest error rate,and the most satisfied need.