期刊文献+

论惩罚性赔偿的损害填补功能——以美国侵权法惩罚性赔偿制度为启示的研究 被引量:45

The Fill in Function of Punishing Payment to Damage: On the Enlightenment of American System of Punishing Payment in the Law of Rights Violation
原文传递
导出
摘要 惩罚性赔偿的损害填补功能关涉惩罚性赔偿制度的正当性证成,这是大多数美国学者不遗余力对其进行论证的主要原因。惩罚性赔偿高于受害人可见的实际损害部分,填补的是受害人私人可见损害背后的无形损害。该无形损害通常难以用金钱衡量,这就是惩罚性赔偿通常以可见损害的倍数计算赔偿数额的原因。无形损害可以是受害人私人难以用金钱衡量的精神损害,也可以是难以用金钱衡量的社会整体利益的损害。于侵权行为对社会整体利益造成巨大损害场合,惩罚性赔偿制度能够激励受害人积极主张权利,并借助于受害人个人利益损失的赔偿填补社会整体利益的损害,令被告承担应当承担的责任。 The fill in function of punishing payment is concerned with the legitimacy of the system of punishing payment system and it is the major reason that most American scholars in law to make a great effort to defend for it.The part of payments higher than the victims' actual damage is for the invisible damage to the victims which usually is difficult to judge by money that is the reason why the punishing payment often is several times of visible damage.The invisible damage could be the mental damage to the victim,and it also could be the damage to the general interests of society where the punishing payment system could inspire the victims' actively involved in rights pursuing and to make the accused to bare the responsibility.
机构地区 吉林大学法学院
出处 《吉林大学社会科学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期117-126,160,共10页 Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition
关键词 美国侵权法 惩罚性赔偿 损害填补功能 社会性损害 punishing payment fill in function of damage socially damage
  • 相关文献

参考文献33

  • 1Thomas B.Colby.Beyond the multiple punishment problem:punitive damages as punishment for individual privatewrongs,Minnesota Law Review,2003,87:593.
  • 2Dan Markel.Retributive damages:a theory of punitive damages as intermediate sanction,Cornell Law Review,2009,94(1):239.
  • 3Marc Galanter.Shadow play:the fabled menace of punitive damages,Wisconsin Law Review,1998,1:1.
  • 4Anthony J.Sebok.Punitive damages:from myth to theory.Iowa Law Review,2007,92:957.
  • 5Anthony J.Sebok.Private law,punishment,and disgorgement;What does it mean to say that a remedy punishes?Chicago-Kent Law Review,2003,78:3.
  • 6Dorsey D.Ellis,Jr.Fairness and efficiency in the law of punitive damages,South California Law Review,1982,56:1.
  • 7Sheila B.Two worlds collide:How the Supreme Court’s recent punitive damages decisions affect class actions,Baylor Law Review,2008,60(Fall):880.
  • 8Robert D.Cooter:Punitive damages,social norms,and economic analysis,Law&Contemp.Prob,1997,60(Summer):73.
  • 9Catherine M.Sharkey:Punitive damages as societal damages,Yale Law Journal,2003,113:347.
  • 10霍姆斯.《普通法》,冉吴等译,北京:中国政法大学出版社,2006年,第1页.

二级参考文献61

共引文献307

二级引证文献234

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部