摘要
ROI、VMI和Cs是基于供应链的三种库存管理方式.本文以两层供应链的ROI、VMI和CS方式为例,通过数学模型和具体算例,比较分析了三种库存方式下买方和卖方成本和利润构成的不同之处.本文研究发现:在长期内相对于ROI方式而言,VMI方式下供应链的效率更高;如果卖方的单位存储成本大于买方,CS方式下供应链的长短期效率可能高于VMI更高于ROI方式.
ROI, VMI and CS are three of most widely discussed partnering initiatives for improving multi-firm supply chain efficiency, that is to say three inventory policies based on supply chain. In this paper, we introduce some mathematics models and try numerical examples for the purpose of examining the analytical expressions of costs and profits of buyer and supplier in such three different policies as ROI, VMI and CS. We draw lessons from the practice of Dong and Xu, divide both cost and profit into two cases (short-term and long-term) and then calculate the cooperation and non-cooperation solutions of both buyer and supplier in ROI, VMI and CS policies according to variable market demand Our results suggest that VMI provides higher efficiency compared with ROI in the long run. If we suppose the unit storage cost of the vendor is greater than the buyer, CS policy may be more effective than the VMI even better than ROI both in the short and long run.
出处
《应用数学学报》
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第3期441-457,共17页
Acta Mathematicae Applicatae Sinica
关键词
零售商占有库存
卖方管理库存
寄售库存
供应链绩效
retailer-owned inventory
vendor managed inventory
consignment stock
supply chain performance