期刊文献+

贸易失衡的根源:汇率还是经济结构——基于美国案例的实证分析 被引量:5

The Root of Trade Imbalance: Exchange Rate or Economic Structure? An Empirical Analysis based on U.S.Case
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于协整理论、Granger因果检验、脉冲响应函数等时间序列处理技术对美国经济结构、财政赤字、汇率与其贸易收支之间的动态关系进行了实证检验。检验结果表明:长期内,实体经济占比的增加会改善贸易收支,虚拟经济占比、财政赤字增加会恶化贸易收支,而汇率水平对于贸易收支的影响不显著;短期内,实体经济占比、虚拟经济占比对贸易收支的影响与长期相一致,财政赤字则相反,而汇率水平的上升在短期内导致贸易盈余的增加,但弹性值有变小的趋势。其政策的含义在于:影响美国贸易收支的主要因素来自其财政赤字及其国内经济结构,即实体经济与虚拟经济创造GDP的比例关系,而非汇率因素。因此,只有通过协调其国内实体经济与虚拟经济的发展,减少财政赤字,收缩储蓄-投资缺口才可以有效地调节贸易失衡问题,而不能一味地强调汇率因素。 The paper studies the dynamic relation among economic structure,fiscal deficits,exchange rate and trade balance in the United States by employing cointegration test,Granger causality test,impulse responses function and so on.The result indicates that in the long time the increase in the proportion of the real economy will improve the trade balance,but the proportion of the fictitious economy,fiscal deficit will worsen the trade balance,and exchange rate for the trade balance is not significant.In short time,both the proportion of the real economy and the proportion of the fictitious economy are consistent with the long-term,but fiscal deficits are on the contrary;the rise in exchange rate will lead to the improvement of trade balance in the short time,but the elasticity has the trend of smaller.The policy implication is that,both U.S.budget deficit and its domestic economic structure are the main factors which affect the trade balance,rather than the exchange rate.Therefore,U.S.regulates the trade imbalances effectively only by coordinating its domestic real economy and fictitious economy and reducing the fiscal deficits,but emphasis on exchange rates is blindly.
作者 刘艳靖 张云
出处 《世界经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期50-56,88,共7页 World Economy Studies
基金 天津社会科学规划项目(TJTJ11003) 全国统计科学研究计划重点项目(2011LZ052) 教育部哲学社会科学重大课题"全球金融危机对我国产业转移和产业升级的影响及对策研究"(批准号09JZD0018)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Abell, j. Twin Deficits during the 1980s: An Empirical Inves- tigation. Journal of Macroeconomics, 1990,12:81-96.
  • 2Evans, P. , Hasan I. Are Consumers Ricardian? Evidence for Canada. Quarterly Review of Economi.ncs and Finance, 1994, 34:25-40.
  • 3Evans. P. Do Budget Deficits Affect the Current Account. Man- useript, Ohio State University, 1998.
  • 4Kanfmann, S. , Seharler, J. ,Winckler, G. The Austrian Cur- rent Account Deficit: Driven by Twin Deficits or by lntertem- poral Expenditure Alloeation? Empirical Economics, 2002, 27 : 529-542.
  • 5Johansen S. Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models. Econometri- ca,1995,59:1551-1580.
  • 6Kim, Roubini, N. Twin Deficit or Twin Divergence? Fiscal Pal- icy, Real Exchange Rate, and the Current Aceount in the US. Society for Economic Dynamics, No. 792,2004.
  • 7Leaehman, L. L. , Francis, B. Twin Deficits: Apparition or Reality? Applied Economics ,2002,34 : 1121-1132.
  • 8Miller, S. M. ,Russek, F. S. Are the Twin Deficits Really Related? Contemporary Policy Issues,1989,7:91-115.
  • 9Vamvoukas, G. A. The Twin Deficits Phenomenon Evidence from Greece. Applied Economics, 1999,31 : 1093-1100.
  • 10Zietz, J. ,Pemberton,D. K. The U. S. Budget and Trade Defi- cits: A Simultaneous Equation Model. Southern Economic Journal, 1990:23-34.

二级参考文献4

共引文献14

同被引文献123

引证文献5

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部