期刊文献+

大学生一般生存图式与心理弹性的关系 被引量:2

On the Relationship Between College Students' General Survival Schema and Resilience
原文传递
导出
摘要 心理弹性研究领域主要关注"效果性因素",而"方向性因素"也具有无以取代的地位,尤其是主体生存图式的作用应该得到心理弹性研究的重视。为了探索主体的生存图式与心理弹性的关系,本研究编制了"一般生存图式量表",并采用"Connor-Davidson韧性量表"中文版(CD-RISC-C)对大学二年级本科生施测。结果发现,大学生一般生存图式与心理弹性在总体水平以及各个维度上的均值都有着一致的变化趋势,两者存在显著的正相关;其中"生存实质"、"积极进取"和"主导价值"3个因素对心理弹性的回归效应显著。由此推论,通过优化主体的生存图式改善其心理弹性是一条可行的途径。 The study of resilience mainly focuses on "efficiency-based factors" rather than "orientation-based factors," which in fact plays an irreplaceable role.In particular,the study of resilience must attach importance to the role of the survival schema.This study aims to probe into the relationship between an individual's survival schema and resilience,by using the General Survival Schema Scale,and the Chinese-language version of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale(CD-RISC-C) to make a survey of a given number of sophomores.The results show that the average scores of the college students' general survival schema and their resilience imply the same trend of changes,as well as a significantly positive correlation between the two;such factors as the essence of survival,positive progress,and the dominant value have a significant regression effect on their resilience.The article concludes that it is a feasible approach to improve an individual's resilience by optimizing his or her survival schema.
出处 《中国特殊教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期87-91,共5页 Chinese Journal of Special Education
基金 济南大学高等教育科学研究课题"基于大学生生存图式的高校价值教育模式研究" 济南大学科研基金项目(项目编号:X0816)成果
关键词 生存图式 心理弹性 大学生 survival schema resilience college student
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kraemer H C, Kazdin A E, Offord D R, et al. Coming to terms with the terms of risks. Archives of General Psychiatry, 1997, 54(4) : 337 - 343.
  • 2Masten A S, Patricia M, David P, et al. Competence under stress: risk and protective factors. In Rolf J, Masten A S, Cicchetti D, et al(Eds. ). Risk and pro- tective factors in the development of psychopathology. UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990. 236 - 256.
  • 3Kumpfer K L. Factors and processes contributing to re- silience: the resilience framework. In Glantz M D, Johnson J L(Eds. ). Resiliency and Development: Pos- itive Life Adaptations. New York: Kluwer Academic, 1999. 179 - 224.
  • 4Richardson G E. The metatheory of resilience and resil- iency. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2002, 58 (3) : 307 - 321.
  • 5于肖楠,张建新.Connor-Davidson韧性量表(CD-RISc)在中国大陆的应用.第十届全国心理学学术大会,上海,2005.
  • 6于肖楠,张建新.自我韧性量表与Connor-Davidson韧性量表的应用比较[J].心理科学,2007,30(5):1169-1171. 被引量:1041
  • 7Lepore L, Brown R. Category and stereotype activation: is prejudice inevitable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1997,72:275 - 287.
  • 8Friborg O, Hjemdal 0 , Rosenvinge J H, et al. A new rating scale for adult resilience: what are the central protective resources behind healthy adjustment? Interna- tional Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 2003, 12(2) :65 - 76.
  • 9胡月琴,甘怡群.青少年心理韧性量表的编制和效度验证[J].心理学报,2008,40(8):902-912. 被引量:996
  • 10Luthar S S, Cicchetti D, Becker B. The construct of re- silience: a critical evaluation and guidelines for future work. Child Development,2000, 71(3) : 543 - 562.

二级参考文献49

共引文献2008

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部