期刊文献+

高校人力资源管理中学生评教的影响因素分析 被引量:10

The Reliability Study to the Students' Assessment in Universities' Human Resources Management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高校教师绩效考核是高校人力资源管理中的重点和难点。学生评价教师教学质量是目前大多数高校普遍采用的考核高校教师绩效的有力手段,其可靠性直接影响着高校教师的绩效考核工作。本文通过对影响学生评教的因素的实证分析,得到学生评教受到学生成绩、课程热门程度以及课堂教学条件3个非教学因素的影响,通过对这3个因素的进一步的定量分析,得到学生评教受非教学因素的影响较小,学生评教的可靠性较高的结论。 Performance appraisal for university teachers is a crucial task in university human resource management when taking its importance and difficulty into consideration.Appraising teachers’ teaching quality by students,a method widely used in university teachers performance management,is effective and efficient.The reality of appraising teachers by students has a direct impact on university teachers’ performance appraisal.Based on the empirical investigation of the influence factors analysis to students’ assessment,3 non-teaching factors affect students’ assessment,include student achievement,course popularity and teaching conditions,through quantitative analysis.Based on the analysis we get the conclusion that the impact of the factors is small and the reliability of the students’ assessment is high.
作者 李楠 王欣
出处 《人口与经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期27-32,44,共7页 Population & Economics
关键词 学生评教 可靠性 影响因素 students’ assessment reliability influencing factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Feldman , K. A. Consistency and Variable among College Students in Rating Their Teachers and Courses [ J ]. Research in Higher Education, 1977, (6).
  • 2Marsh, H. W. Student' s Evaluation of University Teaching Dimensionality, Reliability, Validity, Potential Biases, and Utility [ J ]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, 76.
  • 3魏红,胡祖莹.高校学生评价教师教学质量的可行性研究[J].教师教育研究,1993,8(6):68-73. 被引量:15
  • 4Overall, J. V. & H. W. Marsh. Students' Evaluation of Instruction: A Longitudinal Study of Their Stability [ J ]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1980, 72.
  • 5陈剑启 江晓帆.国内外关于学生评教的相关研究综述.技术监督教育学刊,2006,(2).
  • 6Marsh, H. W&L. A. Rochel. Making Students' Evaluation ofTeachingEffectivenessEffective [J]. American Psychologist, 1997, (11).
  • 7魏红,申继亮.背景特征对学生评价教师教学的影响[J].高等教育研究,2003,24(4):85-90. 被引量:97
  • 8Centra, J. A. The How and Why of Evaluating Teaching [ J]. New Directions for Higher Education, 1977, 17.

二级参考文献14

  • 1胡祖莹,魏红.教学评价中信息来源的可靠性研究[J].教师教育研究,1996,11(3):38-43. 被引量:25
  • 2Feldman, K. A. Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators, and extenud (neutral) observers[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1989,(30):113-135.
  • 3Marsh, H.W. Students' evaluations of university teaching:Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility[ J ]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1984, ( 76 ) :707-754.
  • 4Brandenburg, D. C., Slindle, J. A and Batista, E. E.Student ratings of instruction: Validity and normative interpretations[J]. Research in Higher Education, 1977,(7):67-78.
  • 5Centra, J. A. Reflective Faculty Evaluation[M]. Jossey-Bass Publishers. 1993.
  • 6Marsh, H. W., & Dunkin, M. J. Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In R.P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.) Effective Teaching in Higher Education[ M]. New York: Agathon. 1997.241-320.
  • 7Feldman, K. A. Classsize and students' evaluations of college teacher and courses: A close look [ J ]. Research in Higher Education, 1984, (21) :45-116.
  • 8McKeachie, W. J. Student ratings[J]. American Psychologist, 1997,(52) :1218-1225.
  • 9Greenwald, A. G., & Gillmore, G. M. Grading leniency is a removable contaminant of student ratings[J]. American Psychologist, 1997, (52) : 1209-1217.
  • 10Kenneth A. Feldman. The association between student ratings of specific instructional dimensions and student achievement: Refining and extending the synthesis of data from multisection validity studies[J] 1989,Research in Higher Education(6):583~645

共引文献120

引证文献10

二级引证文献32

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部