摘要
篇均来源期刊标准影响(SNIP)为荷兰学者Moed教授于2010年提出的全新期刊评价指标,旨在对不同主题领域的期刊影响力进行评价,为验证这一评价指标在期刊评价实践中的效用,利用SPSS18.0数据统计分析软件对Scopus数据库中24种外文期刊的SNIP与SJR、h指数以及影响因子进行实证对比分析;以CSSCI为来源数据库统计分析国内6种图书情报学期刊的IF值与SNIP值。分析结果证明,SNIP与其他3个指标之间存在较强的相关性,在期刊评价实践中具有可行性。
A new indicator of journal evaluation is proposed by Moed, a professor of Holland. The purpose of this index is to assess the journal' s influence. In order to confirm its feasibility, this paper carries out the research on the relationship among SNIP, S JR, h -index and IF, taking 24 kinds of academic journals as samples which are overlapped journals included in Scopus. Then it compares the advantages and disadvantages of the four indices ; at the same time, the author lists the IF and SNIP values of six kinds of domestic li- braries and information journals which come from the CSSCI database. As a result, it is shown that the Pearson correlations between SNIP indicators and three other journal evaluation indices are significant.
出处
《图书情报工作》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第10期10-13,共4页
Library and Information Service