1Barnett, et al. An evolutionary model of organizational per- formance[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1994,15 (S. I. ) .. 11--28.
2Barnett W P and Hansen M T. The red queen in organization evolution[J]. Strategic Management Journal, 1996,17 (S. I. ) : 139--157.
3Barnett W P. The dynamics of competitive intensity[J]. Stra- tegic Management Journal, 1997,42 (1) : 128-- 160.
4Barnett W P and Sorenson O. The red queen in organization creation and development[J]. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2002,11 (2) : 289-- 325.
5Barnett W P and McKendrick D. Why are some organizations more competitive than others? Evidence from a changing global market[J]. AdmiIlistrative Science Quarterly, 2004,49 (4) : 535-- 571.
6Barnett W P and Pontikes E G. The red queen: History-de- pendent competition among organizations[J]. Research in Or-ganization Behavior, 2005,26 (2) : 351-- 371.
7Barnett W P and Pontikes E G. The red queen, success bias, and organizational inertia[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54 (7):1237--1251.
8Barney J B and Hoskisson. Strategic groups: Untested asser- tions and research proposals[J]. Managerial and Decision E- conomics, 1990,11(3) : 187--198.
9Chen M-J and MacMillan I (2. Nonresponse and delayed re sponse to competitive moves: The roles of competitor depen- dence and action irreversibility[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1992,35(3) :359-370.
10Chen M-J and Miller D. Competitive attack, retaliation and per{ormance:An expectancy-valence framework[J]. Strate- gic Management Journal, 1994,15 (2) ： 85-102.
