期刊文献+

高阶信念理论如何解决关于意识的难问题

How does the HOT theory answer the hard problem
原文传递
导出
摘要 如何解释现象意识是意识的难问题。高阶信念理论试图为现象意识提供还原性的说明,其中最有代表性的是罗森赛尔的实在主义高阶信念理论和卡拉特斯的倾向主义理论。本文批判性地分析了这两种理论对现象意识的说明,指出其困难,最后提供了原创性的改进版本。 The hard problem of consciousness concerns with the phenomenal aspect of consciousness. Higher-order thought theories provide re- ductive methods to answer the hard problem, of which the most famous ones are the actualist HOT theory advanced by Rosenthal and the dispo- sitionalist HOT theory advanced by Carruthers. I critically analyze these two methods and give an improved version.
作者 李楠
出处 《自然辩证法研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期15-19,共5页 Studies in Dialectics of Nature
关键词 现象意识 高阶信念理论 倾向主义 功能性 Phenomenal Consciousness Higher-order Thought Dispositionalist Functional
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Nagel, T. What Is it Like to Be a Bat? [J]. The Philosoph- ical Review, 1974, LXXXIII : 435- 450.
  • 2Block, N. The Higher Order Approach to Consciousness is Defunct[J]. Analysis, 2011,71(3) :419-431.
  • 3Armstrong,D. A Materialist Theory of the Mind[M]. Lon-don: Routledge, 1968.
  • 4Rosenthal, D. Explaining Conseiousness[A]// In Phi- losophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings[C]. Oxford University Press,2002.
  • 5Rosenthal, D. Higher Order Theories of Consciousness [A]// In OxfordHandbook of the Philosophy of Mind[C]. Clarendon Press, 2009.
  • 6Carruthers, P. Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory[M]. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • 7Millikan, R. Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories[M]. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press,1984.
  • 8Bach-y-Rita, P. and Kercel, S. Sensory substitution and the human-machine interface[J]. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2003(7) : 541-546.
  • 9Carruthers, P. Consciousness: essays from a higher-order perspective[M]. Oxford : Oxford University Press, ZOO5.
  • 10Chalmers, D. The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Funda- mental Theory[M]. Oxford University Press, 1996.

二级参考文献7

  • 1Chalmers, D. J.. The Conscious Mind: In Search ofa Fundamental Theory [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
  • 2Papineau, D.. Thinking about Consciousne.ss[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2002: 47.
  • 3Kripke,S.. Naming and Neoessity[M]. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 1980: 128-134.
  • 4Chalmers, D. J.. The Two-Dimensional Argument Against Materialism[A]. Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of M/nd[ C ]. McI_aughlin, B. (Eds), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009: 313-335.
  • 5Hill, Christopher S., Mclaughlin, Brian P.. There are Fewer Things in Reality Than are Dreamt of in Chalmers' Philosophy[J]. Philoso- phy and Phenomenoiogicd Research, Jun. 1999, Vol. 59, No. 2: 445-454.
  • 6Loaf, B.. Review: David Chalmers' The Conscious Mind[J].Philosophy and Phenomenoiogical Research, Jun. 1999, Vol. 59, No. 2: 465-472.
  • 7Perry, J.. Knowledge, Possibility and Consciousness[M]. Cambridge: MIT Press. 2001: 78.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部