期刊文献+

免用手技术传递手术锐器意愿性调查与分析 被引量:3

A survey on willingness of acceptance of hand free techniques to pass sharp surgical instruments
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的了解外科医师和手术室护士对免用手技术的接受、接纳程度。方法选择外科医师、手术室护士为调查对象,采用自行设计的问卷,调查手术室实施免用手技术传递锐器的意愿性,并了解不同意实施的具体原因。结果共发放199份问卷,回收153份,总回收率为76.9%;被调查者多为女性、工龄>5年、初级职称及医院工作人员,分别占调查人数的70.6%、47.7%、34.6%及44.4%;85.62%被调查者认为有必要在手术室实施免用手技术,护士比医师,初、中级职称比高级职称更容易接受(P<0.01);不同意实施的主要原因为影响手术进行,延长手术时间等。结论调查采用循证手段,根据调查结果实施相应干预,利于新技术的推广和应用,达到减少医院职业暴露、维护医务人员职业健康的目的。 OBJECTIVE To understand the surgeons and operating room nurses′ willingness of acceptance of hand free techniques.METHODS The surgeons and operating room nurses were selected as the study objects,the surgeons and operating room nurses′ willingness of implementation of hand free techniques was investigated by using a self-designed questionnaire,and the reasons to refuse the implementation were discussed.RESULTS A total of 199 questionnaires were distributed and 153 returned,the response rate was 76.9%;most participants were women(70.6%),working for more than five years(47.7%),the junior title staff(34.6%)and hospital regular staff(44.4%);85.6% of the participants believed that it was necessary to implement HFT to pass sharp instruments in operating room,the nurses were more likely than the surgeons,the staff with junior,medium and senior titles to accept it(P〈0.01);the impact on surgery operation and the extending of operation duration were the main reasons to refuse to implement.CONCLUSIONS Evidence-based survey and implementation of appropriate intervention according to the findings would promote the new techniques,reduce occupational exposure and maintain the occupational health of the medical staff.
出处 《中华医院感染学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期2594-2596,共3页 Chinese Journal of Nosocomiology
关键词 手术室 免用手技术 血源暴露 职业安全健康 Operating room; Hands free technique; Blood borne exposure; Occupational safety and health
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1中华人民共和国卫生部.GBZ/T213-2008血源性病原体职业接触防护导则[S].2009.
  • 2Souba WW,Fink MPMD,Gregory JMD,et al.ACS Surgery:Principles and Practice[M].New York:WebMD,2008.
  • 3Stringer B.Hands-free technique and sharps injuries in surgi-cal settings[J].J Am Coll Surg,2010,211(2):295-296.
  • 4徐世兰,吴西亿,饶莉,谭成,乔甫,蒲丹,尹维佳,舒明蓉.840例医务人员锐器伤现状调查[J].中国循证医学杂志,2011,11(6):636-639. 被引量:48

二级参考文献14

  • 1袁丽,蒋红.高职护生职业防护现状调查及对策[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(10):795-796. 被引量:84
  • 2Gupta P. Needle Stick Injury-Consequences and Prevention. Health management, Issue dtd. June 2006. Available at: http://www.expresshealthcaremgmt.com/200606/insight01.shtml.
  • 3CDC. Exposure to blood: What healthcare personnel need to know, 2006. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dhqplpdf/bloodborne pathogens/Exp_to Blood.paf.
  • 4Gershon RR, Vlahov D, Felknor SA, et al. Compliance with universal precautions among health care workers at three regional hospitals. Am Jlnfect Control, 1995, 23(4): 225-236.
  • 5Stringer B, Infante-Rivard C, Hanley J. Quantifying and reducing the risk of bloodhorne pathogen exposure. AORN 1, 2001, 73(6):1135- 40, 1142-3, 1145-6; quiz 1147-8, 1151-4.
  • 6WHO. Protection of the Human Environment, Sharps injuries: Assessing the burden of disease from sharps injuries to health-care workers at national and local levels, Environmental Burden of Disease Series, 2005, No. 11.
  • 7Allen G. Needle-stick injuries; coronary artery bypass; dressings; retained objects. American Journal of Infection Control, 2003, 77(6):1260, 1262.
  • 8Shen C, Jagger J, Pearson RD. Risk of needle stick and sharp object injuries among medical students. Am J lnfect Control, 1999, 27(5): 435-437.
  • 9Knight VM, Bodsworth NJ. Perceptions and practice of universal blood and body fluid precautions by registered nurses at a major Sydney teaching hospital. JAdv Nurs, 1998, 27(4): 746-751.
  • 10Lee JM, Botteman MF, Xanthakos N, et al. Needlestick injuries in the United States. Epidemiologic, economic, and quality of life issues. AAOHNJ, 2005, 53(3): 117-133.

共引文献48

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部