摘要
马克思和恩格斯有一个共同的观点:人和自然在其完成形态上是同一的。由此决定了他们有共同的历史辩证法思想。马克思的人学辩证法和恩格斯的自然辩证法都只是历史辩证法的特殊形态。卡弗不了解这一点,误从私有制条件下人与自然的对立出发,得出了马克思和恩格斯在辩证法问题上对立的结论。只要了解了马克思政治经济学批判的对象和方法,就可以消除这一误解。
Marx and Engels have a common viewpoint that human and nature in their completed form are one. This leads to their common thinking about historical dialectics. Marx' s human dialectics and Engels' natural dialectics are just different forms of historical dialectics. Caver missed this viewpoint, erroneously started with the human and natural opposition conditioned by the private property, and came to the conclusion that Marx and Engels were op- posed to each other on the problem of dialectics. This misunderstanding can be avoided if we learn about Marx' s object and method of critique of political economy.
出处
《科学技术哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第3期29-33,共5页
Studies in Philosophy of Science and Technology
关键词
唯物辩证法
政治经济学批判
私有制
人与自然
materialistic dialectic
critique of political economy
private ownership
man and nature