期刊文献+

一种新的冲突表征下的异类源信息融合算法 被引量:3

Heterogeneous sources information fusion algorithm based on new characterization of conflict
下载PDF
导出
摘要 异类源信息融合时常遇到证据高度冲突的情况,此时应用传统Dempster-Shafe(rD-S)证据理论进行融合将出现错误的结果。针对以往冲突证据融合研究中使用冲突系数k表征证据之间的冲突程度所存在的不足,提出了一种新的证据冲突表征方法。在此基础上确定证据间的冲突度和相似度,得到证据的权重。对加权修正后的证据利用D-S证据理论进行融合。算例验证表明该方法可以有效地对冲突证据进行融合,收敛效果较好。 Error results may be obtained when the combined evidences provided by heterogeneous sources are in high degree of conflict. Considering the deficiencies of using the conflict coefficient k to represent the conflict degree in previous conflict evidences fusion studies, a new definition of evidence conflict is proposed. The degree of conflict and similarity among evidences are calculated to obtain the evidence weight. The evidences modified by the weight vector are combined using the Dempster-Shafer (D-S) combination rule. Numerical examples show that this method can combine conflict evidences effectively, and have a good convergence.
出处 《计算机工程与应用》 CSCD 2012年第18期123-126,147,共5页 Computer Engineering and Applications
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.61171155) 西北工业大学研究生创业种子基金(No.Z2012076)
关键词 异类源信息 信息融合 证据理论 证据冲突 冲突表示 heterogeneous sources information information fusion evidence theory evidence conflict conflict characterization
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献112

共引文献465

同被引文献42

  • 1肖明珠,陈光.一种改进的证据合成公式[J].电子学报,2005,33(9):1714-1716. 被引量:8
  • 2郭华伟,施文康,邓勇,陈智军.证据冲突:丢弃,发现或化解?[J].系统工程与电子技术,2007,29(6):890-898. 被引量:55
  • 3Dempster A P. Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping[J]. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1967, 38(2): 325-339.
  • 4Shafer G. A Mathematical Theory of Evidence[M]. Princeton, N J: Princeton University Press, 1976: 3-34.
  • 5Zadeh L A. A simple view of the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and its implication for the rule of combination[J]. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 1986, 7(1): 85-90.
  • 6Yager R R. On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules[J]. Information Sciences, 1987, 41(2): 93-137.
  • 7Murphy C K. Combining of belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2000, 29(1): 1-9.
  • 8Deng Yong, Shi Weng-kang, Zhu Zhen-fu, et al.. Combining belief functions based on distance of evidence[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2004, 38(3): 489-493.
  • 9Jousselme A L, Dominic G, and Bosse E. A new distance between two bodies of evidence[J]. Information Fusion, 2001,2(2): 91-101.
  • 10Liu Zhun-ga, Dezert J, Pan Quan, et al.. Combination of sources of evidence with different discounting factors based on a new dissimilarity measure[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011, 52(1): 133-141.

引证文献3

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部