期刊文献+

不同质量比鸡胸肉、鸡腿肉混合肌原纤维蛋白的热诱导凝胶特性 被引量:10

Heat-Induced Gel Prosperities of Mixed Chicken Breast and Leg Myofibrillar Proteins at Various Ratios
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以鸡胸肉和鸡腿肉为材料,研究鸡胸、鸡腿肉混合肌原纤维蛋白不同质量比(9:1、3:1、1:1、1:3、1:9)热变性温度、质构特性、流变特性和保水性的差异。结果表明:鸡胸肉肌原纤维蛋白的凝胶特性显著优于鸡腿肉,鸡胸肉与鸡腿肉的混合可以显著提升鸡腿肉蛋白的硬度、保水性;混合蛋白中,m鸡胸肉蛋白:m鸡腿肉蛋白为9:1的蛋白硬度、保水性最大,分别达到167.64g和83.6%,其凝胶特性和纯鸡胸肉差异不大;m鸡胸肉蛋白:m鸡腿肉蛋白为1:9的混合蛋白硬度、保水性和贮能模量终值均为最小,分别为110.82g、48.75%和297Pa,其凝胶特性优于纯鸡腿肉肌原纤维蛋白。 The gel properties of mixed chicken breast and leg myofibrillar proteins at various ratios were studied by measuring thermal denaturation temperature,texture characteristics,rheological properties and water-holding capacity(WHC).The results showed that the gel properties of breast myofibrillar protein were significantly better than those of leg myofibrillar protein.The hardness and WHC of leg myofibrillar protein could be improved by mixing breast myofibrillar protein.The mixed myofibrillar proteins at the mass ratio of 9:1 had the highest hardness and WHC,which were 167.64 g and 83.6%,respectively,and the gel properties were generally similar with those of breast myofibrillar protein.However,the mixed myofibrillar proteins at the mass ratio of 1:9 had the lowest hardness,WHC and terminal value of storage modulus,which were 110.82 g,48.75% and 297 Pa,respectively,and the gel properties were better than those of leg myofibrillar protein.
出处 《食品科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第9期58-63,共6页 Food Science
基金 国家现代农业产业技术体系项目(CARS-42)
关键词 鸡胸肉肌原纤维蛋白 鸡腿肉肌原纤维蛋白 凝胶特性 保水性 质构特性 流变特性 热变性温度 breast myofibrillar protein leg myofibrillar protein gel properties thermal denaturation temperature texture characteristics rheological properties water-holding capacity
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1周光宏.畜产晶加工学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2002:40-41.
  • 2LESIOW T, XIONG YoulingL.. Chicken muscle homogenate gelation properties: effect of pH and muscle fiber type[l]. Meat Science, 2003, 64 (4): 399-403.
  • 3FRETHEIM K, SAMEJIMA K, EGELANDSDAL B. Myosins from red and white bovine muscles. Part 1: gel strength (elasticity) and water- holding capacity of heat-induced gels[J]. Food Chemistry, 1986, 22(2): 107-121.
  • 4ASGHAR A, MORITA J I, SAMEJIMA K, et al. Biochemical and functional characteristics of myosin from red and white muscles of chicken as influenced by nutritional stress[J]. J Agric Boil Chem, 1984, 48: 2217-2224.
  • 5CHOE I S, MORITA J I, YAMAMOTO K, et al. Heat-inducedgelation of myosirdsubfragments from chicken leg and breast muscle at high ionic strength and low pH[J]. Food Science, 1991, 56: 884- 890.
  • 6XIONG YoulingL, LOU X, WANG C, et al. Protein extraction from chicken myofibrils irrigated with various polyphosphate and NaC1 solutions[J]. Journal of Food Science, 2000, 65 (1): 96-100.
  • 7GORNALL A G, BARDWILL C J, DAVID M M. Determination of serum proteins by means of the biuret reation[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1949, 177(2): 751-766.
  • 8LAEMMLI U K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4[J]. Nature, 1970, 227: 680-685.
  • 9LIU Gang, XIONG YoulingL.. Contribution of lipid and protein oxida- tion to rheological differences between chicken white and red muscle myofibrillar proteins[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2000, 48(4): 1016-1023.
  • 10KOCHER P N, FOEGEDING E A. Microcentrifuge-based method for measuring water-holding of protein gels[J]. Journal of Food Science, 1993, 58(5): 1040-1046.

同被引文献158

引证文献10

二级引证文献70

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部