期刊文献+

从简化到复杂:比较教育范式研究 被引量:4

From the Simplified to Complexity:A Study on the Paradigm of Comparative Education
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在归纳主义的背景下,牛顿经典力学和简单范式的巨大成功,使得人文社会科学也仿照简单范式的方法、原则,探求各自领域的普遍性、必然性的规律。比较教育学也不例外。它从诞生之日起,就一直在简化思维即历史主义和实证主义的范式下徘徊不前。这种思维方式在当时虽然有助于比较教育的发展,但从长远来看,简化范式本身所固有的缺陷使其无法解决比较教育研究所面临的困境。只有转变思维方式,从实体走向关系或生成,即从复杂性的视角重新审视比较教育研究,才是解决这一问题的出路。 Under the background of the inductivism,the great success of the Newton classical mechanics and the simple paradigm makes humanities social science also counterfeit the methods and principles of the simple paradigm to explore universality and necessity law of their respective fields.There is no exception for Comparative education.It has been going around from its birth day under the paradigm of simplified thinking,namely the historical principle and the positivism.Although this thinking way is conducive to the development of the comparative education at that time,in the long run,because of the defects of the ontology,epistemology and methodology which the simplified paradigm itself inherent make it cannot solve the dilemma that the comparative education faces.Only transforming the thinking way,from the solid to relationship or generation,namely reviewing the comparative education research from the perspective of complexity is the outlet of solving this problem.
作者 杨素萍
出处 《外国教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期3-9,共7页 Studies in Foreign Education
基金 教育部2011年度人文社会科学项目<比较教育范式研究>(项目编号:11YJC8801422)
关键词 比较教育 复杂性 简化范式 comparative education complexity simplified thinking
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Tomas Kuhn. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (2nd ed.) [ M ]. Chicago: Univiersity of Chicago Press, 1970. 175.
  • 2Kandel. The Methodology of Comparative Education [J]. International Review of Education, 1959, (5) :270.
  • 3[美]伊曼纽尔·沃勒斯坦.知识的不确定性[M].济南:山东大学出版社,2006..
  • 4Brian Holmes. Paradigm Shifts in Comparative Education [A]. P.G. Kelly (eds). New Approaches to Comparative Education [C ]. Chicago and London :The University of Chicago Press, 1986. 182.
  • 5Brian Holmes. The Contribution of Comparative Education to Educational Research [J]. Paidcia, 1975, (4) : 149.
  • 6[6][法]埃德加·莫兰.方法:思想观念--生境、生命、习性与组织[M].秦海鹰译.北京:北京大学出版社,2002.8,95
  • 7于根·施瑞尔.变革中的比较教育方法论:面向复杂性研究[A].陈时见,徐辉.比较教育的学科发展与研究方法[C].北京:商务印书馆,2006.211,212,202-203.
  • 8[英]米歇尔·D.迈克马斯特.智能优势:组织的复杂性[M].王烷尘,等译.成都:四川人民出版社.2000.6.
  • 9[英]拉尔夫·D.斯泰西.组织中的复杂性与创造性[M].成都:四川人民出版社,2000.
  • 10A. N. Whitehead. Process and Reality [ M ]. New York : Macmillan, 1978.3.

二级参考文献7

共引文献403

同被引文献50

引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部