歌曲翻唱行为的合法抑或非法--兼评《著作权法》修改草案第46条被引量：8

Music Cover:Legal or Illegal:On Article 46 in Revision Draft of Copyright Law

下载PDF

导出

摘要翻唱行为是指在制作录音制品或者在具有商业性质的表演中,演唱由他人享有著作权的歌曲的行为,并分为直译性翻唱与演绎性翻唱。对未经著作权人许可的翻唱行为侵权责任的认定,首先应区分翻唱行为的类型,进而在综合考量著作权人、侵权行为人与社会公共利益等相关因素的基础上进行判断。 Music cover which is divided into direct cover and indirect cover means singing songs owned by other people in producing sound recordings or in a commercial performance .To identify the tort liability of music cover, we should firstly make a distinguish about different types of music cover, and then consider the benefit of the copyright owner, the tort-feasor and the society to make a judgement.

作者苏平何培育

机构地区重庆理工大学知识产权学院中国作家文学艺术作品版权保护研究基地

出处《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期25-29,共5页 Intellectual Property

关键词翻唱法定许可侵权责任利益平衡 music cover statutory license tort liability balance of interest

分类号 D923.41 [政治法律—民商法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献10

1孙丽萍、旭日阳刚被禁唱《春天里》引版权保护争论,http://fun.hsw.cn/system/201I/02/14/050791119.shtml.
2雷美琴:《掀开“翻唱”歌曲的面纱-流行歌坛“翻唱”歌曲的审美品评》,载《人民音乐》2007年第7期,第76-78页.
3SamRick-etson&Jane C.Ginsburg, International Copyright and Neigh-boring Rights:The Berne Convention and Beyond, New York:Oxford University Press, 2006, p.207.
4[德]M·雷炳德张恩民译.《著作权法》[M].法律出版社,2005年版.第267页.
5王迁.论“制作录音制品法定许可”及在我国《著作权法》中的重构[J].东方法学,2011(6):50-58. 被引量：33
6熊琦.著作权法定许可的正当性解构与制度替代[J].知识产权,2011,21(6):38-43. 被引量：62
7冯晓青.著作权法目的与利益平衡论[J].科技与法律,2004(2):84-87. 被引量：39
8Abend v. MCA, Inc; Universal Film Exchange, Inc.; James Stewart; Patricia Hitchcock;Samuel Taylor.863 F.2d 1465 (9th Cir.1988).
9David Lange, Mary LaFrance, Gary Myers :Intellectual Property Cases and Materials,West Publishing Co.1998, p.996.
10Sheldon v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Pictures Corp., 106 F.2d 45 (2d Cir. 1939).

二级参考文献18

1吴汉东.科技、经济、法律协调机制中的知识产权法[J].法学研究,2001,23(6):128-148. 被引量：184
2Neil Weinstock Netanel.Impose a Noncommercial Use Levy to Allow Free Peer-To-Peer File Sharing. Harv.J.L.&Tech . 2003
3White-Smith Pub.Co.v.Apollo Co. 209U.S.I . 1908
4Ralph S.Brown,Robert C.Denicola.Cases on Copyright:Unfair Competition,And Related Topics Bearing On The Protections Of Works Of Authorship. . 2009
5David Israelite.Testimony of David Israelite:Subcommittee on Courts,The Internet,and Intellectual Property of the Committee on the Judiciary House of Representatives. . 2006
6Stuart M.Maxey.That CARP is No Keeper:Copyright Arbitration Royalty Panels-Change is Needed,Here is Why and How. J.Intell.Prop.L . 2003
7United States of America v.American Society of Composers,Authors and Publishers,Civ.Action No.41-1395. . 2001
8William Fisher.Promises to Keep:Technology,Law and the Future of Entertainment. . 2004
9Guido Calabresi,A Douglas Melamed.Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral. Harvard Law Review . 1972
10Robert P Merges.Contracting into Liability Rules: Intellectual Property Rights and Collective Rights Organizations. California Law Review . 1996