期刊文献+

美国专利侵权损害赔偿中的分摊规则问题 被引量:9

Apportionment Rule for Patent Infringement Damages in U.S
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在专利侵权损害赔偿确定中,以侵权产品的总价值中可归功于被侵权专利技术的贡献确定专利侵权损害赔偿的分摊规则,有助于解决全部市场价值规则所导致的过度赔偿及专利权排他权非法扩张等问题。美国一百多年相关实践对分摊规则进行了有益探索,我国应借鉴美国的经验对专利侵权损害赔偿制度进行完善。 In measuring patent infi'ingement damages, the apportionment rule has been found as a solution to prevent the over-compensation and unlawful expansion of the scope of the patent resulting by the application of the entire market value rule. Under the apportionment rule, the overall value of the infiinged product that is allributable to the infringed patented technology is identified. The apportionment rule, used in the U.S. for more than 100 years, can be applied to identify patent infringement damages in China, which will lead to the perfection of the damage system.
作者 吴广海
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期82-88,共7页 Intellectual Property
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目 No.NUST2012YBXM040"的研究成果
关键词 专利侵权 损害赔偿 分摊规则 patent infringement damages apportionment role
  • 相关文献

参考文献36

  • 1Daralyn J. Durie , Mark A Lemley , A Structured Approach to Calculating Reasonable Royalties, 14:2 Lewis &Clark Law Review 627, 628(2010).
  • 2Michael J. Kasdan, Joseph Casino, Federal Court Closely Scrutinizing and Slashing Patent Damage Awards, 4Patently-O Patent Law Journal24, 26(2010).
  • 3Lucent Technologies, Inc., et al. v. Gateway, Inc., et al., 580F. 3d 1301, 1337(Fed. Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 30 S. Ct. 3324(2010).
  • 4Centocor Ortho Biotech, Inc. v. Abbott Labs., 2:07-CV-139-TJW, 2009WL 3734119(E. D.Tex. Nov. 4, 2009).
  • 5Mark A. Lemley, Distinguishing Lost Profits from Reasonable Royalties, 51William and Mary Law Review655, 656(2009).
  • 6Daralyn J. Durie, Mark A Lemley, A Structured Approach to Calculating Reasonable Royalties, 14:2 Lewis & Clark Law Review 627, 628(2010).
  • 7Elizabeth M. Bailey, et al., Making Sense of "Apportionment" in Patent Damages, XII Columbia Science and Technology Law Review255,256(2011).
  • 8Eric E. Bensen, Using Apportionment to Rein in the Georgia-Pacific Factors(April 2007), at 15. available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=982897.
  • 9Amy L. Landers, Patent Claim Apportionment, Patentee Injury, and Sequential Invention,19:2 GEO.MASON L. REV. 471,476(2012).
  • 10Eric E. Bensen, Apportionment of Lost Profit in Contemporary Patent Damages Cases, lO:8Virginia Journal of Law & Technology 1, 7(2005).

共引文献2

同被引文献104

引证文献9

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部