期刊文献+

灵龟八法治疗急性脑梗塞痉挛性构音障碍的临床研究 被引量:3

Clinical Study of Acupuncture Guided by Liugui 8 Methods Theory for Spasmodic Dysarthria Caused by Cerebrovascular Infarction
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:对比观察灵龟八法与石氏醒脑开窍法对急性脑梗塞痉挛性构音障碍的临床疗效。方法:将受试者随机分为灵龟八法组、醒脑开窍组、灵龟加醒脑组3组,每组各31例,均进行3周治疗。结果:(1)治疗1周、2周、3周后,各组日本言语和嗓音医学学会GRBAS分级G项等级分布情况、Frenchay相关评分均较前1周有显著性差异(P<0.05);治疗3周后,灵龟加醒脑组较灵龟组、醒脑组有显著性差异(P<0.05)。(2)治疗3周后,灵龟组总有效率71.0%,醒脑组74.2%,两组无显著性差异(P>0.05),灵龟加醒脑组93.5%,与前两组比较,均有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论:灵龟八法、醒脑开窍法对急性脑梗塞痉挛性构音障碍都有较好治疗效果,两者疗效相似,且联用后疗效明显优于任一单用疗法。灵龟八法取穴少而精,方便安全,刺激量小,值得临床推广运用。 Objective:To estimate the validity of acupuncture guided by Liugui 8 Methods Theory for Spasmodic Dysarthria caused by Cerebrovaseular Infarction. Methods : 93 patients were randomly distributed into Lingui Group ( group A ) , Xingnao Kaiqiao Group( group B) , Lingui plus Xingnao Kaiqiao Group( group C) , with 31 cases in each group. Results:We used GRBAS and Frenchay Index as efficacy indexes. After 1,2 and 3 weeks ,we found all groups showed significant changes compared with the beginning point ( P 〈 O. 05 ). After 3 weeks,we found Group C earned better scores both in GRBAS and Frenehay Index compared with the other 2 groups( P 〈 0.05 ). After 3 weeks'therapy, Group A gained 71% efficacy, Group B gained 74.2% , and Group C 93.5%. Conclusion:Both Linagui Methods and Xingnao Kaiqiao showed satisfying similar effect on Spasmodic Dysarthria caused by Cerebrovaseular Infarction, however, when the 2 methods were combined, better effects would be gained.
出处 《辽宁中医杂志》 CAS 2012年第6期1104-1106,共3页 Liaoning Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 广东省中医药管理局立项课题(2009187)
关键词 急性脑梗塞 痉挛性构音障碍 灵龟八法 Spasmodic Dysarthria Cerebrovascular Infarction acupuncture guided by Liugui 8 Methods Theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献25

  • 1张存生,周继曾,武连仲,蒋戈利,石学敏.针刺治疗假性延髓麻痹325例临床研究[J].中国医药学报,1995,10(2):18-20. 被引量:29
  • 2韩仲明.嗓音声学检测分析[J].中国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科,2006,13(5):351-353. 被引量:32
  • 3Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, et al. The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia[J]. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2004,261 : 429.
  • 4Morsomme D, Jamart J, Wery C, et al. Comparison between the GIRBAS scale and the acoustic and aerodynamic measures provided by EVA for the assessment of dysphonia following unilateral vocal fold paralysis[J]. Folia Phoniatricaet Logopaedica, 2001,53 : 317.
  • 5Yu P, Revis J, Wuyts FL, et al. Correlation of instrumental voice evaluation with perceptual voice analysis using a modified visual analog scale[J]. Folia Phoniatr Logop,2002,54:271.
  • 6Chan KM, Yiu EM. The effect of anchors and training on the reliability of perceptual voice evaluation[J]. J Speech Lang Hear Res,2002,45:111.
  • 7Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, et al. Development and vail-dation of the voice handicap index-10 [J]. Laryngoscope, 2004,114:1549.
  • 8Franic DM, Bramlett RE, Bothe AC. Psychometric evaluation of disease specific quality of life instruments in voice disorders[J]. J Voice,2005,19:300.
  • 9Deary IJ, Webb A, Mackenzie K,et al. Short, self-report voice symptom scales: psychometric characteristics of the voice handicap index-10 and the vocal performance question naire[J]. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2004,131 :232.
  • 10Jacobson BH, Johnson A, Grywalsky C, et al. The voice handicap index (VHI): development and validation[J]. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 1997,6:66.

共引文献99

同被引文献67

引证文献3

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部