期刊文献+

Molecular phylogeny of tribe Atraphaxideae(Polygonaceae)evidenced from five cpDNA genes 被引量:2

Molecular phylogeny of tribe Atraphaxideae(Polygonaceae)evidenced from five cpDNA genes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Traditionally, Atraphaxis, Calligonum, Pteropyrum and Parapteropyrum are included in the tribe Atraphxideae. Recently, sequence data has revealed that this tribe is not monophyletic. The structure of the tribe was examined by adding more taxa and sequences to clarify the congruence between morphology and molecular phylogeny, the systematic placements of four genera in Polygonaceae, as well as the infra-generic relationships of Atraphaxis and Calligonum within Atraphaxideae. Five chloroplast genes, atpB-rbcL, psbA-trnH, trnL-tmF, psbK-psbl, and rbcL of Atraphaxis, Calligonum, Pteropyrum, and Parapteropyrum were sequenced. The non-monophyly of Atraphaxideae was confirmed. Atraphaxis and Calligonum, respectively, formed a monophyletic group that was well supported. Calligonum is closely related to Pteropyrum; Atraphaxis is sister to Polygonum s. str. and Parapteropyrum is allied with Fagopyrum. Although the morphology suggested the four genera should form a tribe, the molecular data indicated Atraphaxideae was not one monophyletic group. The clades identified within Atraphaxis corresponded well with the current sectional classification based on morphological features. As for Cal- ligonum, Medusa was identified as a non-monophyletic section. Traditionally, Atraphaxis, Calligonum, Pteropyrum and Parapteropyrum are included in the tribe Atraphxideae. Recently, sequence data has revealed that this tribe is not monophyletic. The structure of the tribe was examined by adding more taxa and sequences to clarify the congruence between morphology and molecular phylogeny, the systematic placements of four genera in Polygonaceae, as well as the infra-generic relationships of Atraphaxis and Calligonum within Atraphaxideae. Five chloroplast genes, atpB-rbcL, psbA-trnH, trnL-tmF, psbK-psbl, and rbcL of Atraphaxis, Calligonum, Pteropyrum, and Parapteropyrum were sequenced. The non-monophyly of Atraphaxideae was confirmed. Atraphaxis and Calligonum, respectively, formed a monophyletic group that was well supported. Calligonum is closely related to Pteropyrum; Atraphaxis is sister to Polygonum s. str. and Parapteropyrum is allied with Fagopyrum. Although the morphology suggested the four genera should form a tribe, the molecular data indicated Atraphaxideae was not one monophyletic group. The clades identified within Atraphaxis corresponded well with the current sectional classification based on morphological features. As for Cal- ligonum, Medusa was identified as a non-monophyletic section.
出处 《Journal of Arid Land》 SCIE 2012年第2期180-190,共11页 干旱区科学(英文版)
基金 supported by Chinese Academy of Sciences Important Direction for Knowledge Innovation Project (KZCX2-EW-305),Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography,Chinese Academy of Sciences
关键词 tribe Atraphaxideae Atraphaxis Calligonum chloroplast genes MONOPHYLY tribe Atraphaxideae Atraphaxis Calligonum chloroplast genes monophyly
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Bao B J,Li A J.1993.A study of the genus Atraphaxis in China and thesystem of Atraphaxideae(Polygonaceae).Acta PhytotaxonomicaSinica,31:127–139.
  • 2Brandbyge J.1993.Polygonaceae.In:Kubitzki K,Bittich V.The Fami-lies and Genera of Vascular Plants.Berlin:Springer,531–544.
  • 3Dammer U.1893.Polygonaceae.In:Engler H G A,Prantl K A E.Dienatürlichen Pflanzenfamilie.Leipzig:Engelmann,1–36.
  • 4Doyle J J,Doyle J L.1987.A rapid DNA isolation procedure for smallquantities of fresh leaf material.Phytochemical Bulletin,19:11–15.
  • 5Farris J S,K?llersj?M,Kluge A G,et al.1994.Testing significance ofincongruence.Cladistics,10:315–319.
  • 6Farris J S,K?llersj?M,Kluge A G,et al.1995.Constructing a signifi-cance test for incongruence.Systmatic Biology,44:570–572.
  • 7Felsenstein J.1985.Confidence limits on phylogenies:an approachusing the bootstrap.Evolution,39:783–791.
  • 8Haraldson K.1978.Anatomy and taxonomy in Polygonaceae subfam.Polygonoideae Meisn.emend.Jaretzky.Symbolae Botanicae Upsa-liensis,22:1–95.
  • 9Heywood V H,Brummitt P K,Culham A,et al.2007.Flowering PlantFamilies of the World.London:Kew Publishing.
  • 10Hong S-P.1995.Pollen morphology of Parapteropyrum and someputatively related genera(Polygonaceae-Atraphaxideae).Grana,34:153–159.

同被引文献26

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部