摘要
刑事诉讼法修正案(草案)中对于犯罪嫌疑人、被告人亲属的免证权和律师受限制的免证权的规定,是维系社会稳定的外部控制措施(法律规范)和内部控制措施(关系人之间的信赖)之间进行衡平选择的结果。目前关于免证权的规定表现了法律规范内部不统一,同时有免证权虚置的可能,而且可能给律师制度带来消极影响。为避免这些消极后果,应当通过扩大免证权的亲属范围、扩充亲属免于作证的诉讼阶段、免除律师的强制作证义务的方式进行合理化。
The Criminal Lawsuit Amendment(Draft) has regulated the "Garnishment Exempt Rights" of the suspect,the relatives of the suspect and the restriction of the lawyer,which is the result of balance to guard the social stabilities' external control(the trust between the related men).At present,the regulation of the "Garnishment Exempt Rights" shows inner un-unity of the law rules,and it is possible that the "Garnishment Exempt Rights" is in vain,and it may bring the Negative effect to the lawyer.To avoid those bad influences in the lawsuit period and exempt the lawyer's compulsory testify,making those aspects more rational.
出处
《贵州警官职业学院学报》
2012年第1期52-55,66,共5页
Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
关键词
免证权
免证权面相
免证权合理化
the "Garnishment Exempt Rights"
the "Garnishment Exempt Rights" Object
the "Garnishment Exempt Rights" Rationalization