论司法实践中类推适用的相似性判断标准

On the analogy in the judicial practice for similarity criterion

类比推理作为创造性法律解释中的一种重要方法,其具体适用的妥当性很大程度上取决于裁判者对法定案型事实与待决案件的相似性判断。因此,相似性判断标准必须保证裁判结果的确定、客观和公正。这需要裁判者从不同的视野范围,以不同的态度评价规范与事实的相似性,根据不同的情况,排除主观因素的干扰,最大程度地追求司法结果的确定性,在存在与当为、方法与结果之间进行合理的反思。

As an important method of creative interpretation of law,to a large extent the proper of specific application of analogy depends on the judge to similarity judgment of pending cases and legal cases type by justice.Therefore,the standard of similarity judgment should ensure the certain,objectivity and fair of judicial results.This requires the justice to evaluate the similarities between pending cases and legal cases from range of vision the size of which is different,in different attitudes as well as avoiding the influence of subjective elements according to different circumstances,in order to try their best to make sure the certainty of judicial result,and introspect properly between there are and when to.