期刊文献+

人民调解协议司法确认之定性分析 被引量:44

The Attribution of Judicatory Affirmation of People's Mediation Agreement
原文传递
导出
摘要 人民调解协议从性质上讲属于双方当事人为解决纠纷而订立的和解契约。《人民调解法》第33条所确定的司法确认制度本质上乃是人民法院依当事人双方的申请赋予人民调解协议以强制执行力之制度,司法确认程序属于非讼程序。《人民调解法》所规定的人民调解协议司法确认之路径是有违民事实体法和诉讼法理的。应当在立足于司法确认程序乃非讼程序之基础上,遵循人民法院审查人民调解协议所约定的内容是否适于强制执行之路径进行具体的程序设计。 People' s mediation agreement in nature is a reconciliation agreement between two concerning parties by taking to them and trying to troubleshooting. According to the Art. 33 of People' s Mediation Law of the People' s Republic of China( PML), the judicatory affirmation system in nature is a system that court gives the people' s mediation agreement the enforcement powers upon their request, Judicatory affirmation procedure is a non -judicial procedure. However, this medi- ation judicatory affirmation system in the PML runs against the civil substantive law and jurisprudence of procedure law. The right approach for it is to follow the concrete procedure shaped by court when it checks the mediation agreement that is suitable for enforcement, based on the cognizance of which the reconciliation procedure is a non - judicial procedure.
作者 占善刚
机构地区 武汉大学法学院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期140-145,共6页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 人民调解协议 和解契约 司法确认 非讼程序 强制执行力 people's mediation agreement reconciliation agreement judicatory affirmation non-judicial proce-dure enforcement power
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1[日]小岛武司,小林学.基本讲义民事诉讼法[M].东京:信山社,2005.
  • 2[日]伊藤真.民事诉讼法[M].东京:弘文堂,2005.
  • 3许士宦.“非讼事件法修正后程序保障之新课题”[J].月旦法学杂志,2005,:236-236.
  • 4林洲富.实用非讼事件法[M].台北:五南图书出版公司,2009.
  • 5魏大喨.《新非讼事件法总则问题解析》[J].月旦法学杂志,2005,(8).
  • 6杨与龄.强制执行法论[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,2002.7

共引文献46

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部