大陆法系缺席判决制度价值取向研究——从缺席判决主义到一方辩论主义视角的考察

The Value of Doctrine of Default Judgment in Civil Law System:Review form the Perspective of Doctrine of Default Judgment to One Part Debate Judgment

缺席判决制度自古罗马时即已有之,从缺席判决主义模式到一方辩论主义模式的变迁反映了缺席判决制度从纯粹作为的一种终结程序的手段和一种惩罚措施转向更加重视程序的正当性即程序公正问题,但就缺席判决制度本身而言,它是为了诉讼的效益而设。

Default judgment mode has existed since ancient Rome.The default judgment mode has been replaced by one part debate judgment mode,which reflects that taking default judgment merely as a means to end the procedure or a punitive measure gives way to highlighting the fairness of procedure.Nevertheless,default judgment is designed to benefit the litigation efficiency.