期刊文献+

论伯纳德·威廉斯的功利主义批判 被引量:3

On Bernard Williams' Critique of Utilitarianism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 伯纳德.威廉斯在对功利主义后果论的结构分析中指出其责任原则的显著缺陷是冷漠与消极,对效用最大化的追求导致功利主义把价值赋予事态而忽视个人分离性,而过度的道德义务要求使个体与自身道德情感及行为相异化,破坏了行动者的道德完整性。虽然威廉斯的功利主义批判饱受质疑,但他对人性、品质的重视与对个人生活意义的关切,切中了功利主义的要害,敞开了走出现代道德哲学困境的新路径。 Bernard Williams stands on the position of the agent criticize utilitarianism. In the analysis of the consequentialist structure of utilitarianism, he points out the significant defects of its responsibility principles are indifference and negative. The pursuit of maximize benefits leads to utilitarianism giving val- ue to state of affairs, ignoring the personal separateness. And the too much demanding makes individuals alienate from their moral feelings and behaviors, therefore destructs the agent's moral integrity. The responses of many scholars are neither a threat to William's critique nor a defense of utilitarianism. William' s criticism reflects his concern about human nature, personal characters and the meaning of life; which makes up the shortage of modern moral philosophy theories.
作者 潘红霞
出处 《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期101-105,共5页 Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
关键词 后果主义 功利主义 个人分离性 完整性 consequentialism utilitarianism personal separability integrity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Bernard Williams. A Critique of Utilitarianism[C]. (eds) by J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams. Utilitarianism: For and a- gainst. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
  • 2毛兴贵.伯纳德·威廉斯对功利主义的批判[J].中国人民大学学报,2010,24(3):38-45. 被引量:13
  • 3[英]伯纳德·威廉斯.道德运气[M].徐向东,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2007:19.
  • 4James Lehman. Utilitarianism and Obviousness[J]. Utilitas, 2004, 16,(3) :322--325.
  • 5Martin Hollis. The Shape of a Life[C]. World, Mind and Ethics: Essays on the Ethical Philosophy of Bernard Williams. (eds) by J. Altham and Ross Harrison. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Press, 1995.
  • 6Damian Cox~ La Caze. Should We Strive For Integrity [J]. Journal of Value Inquiry, 1999, (33):519-530.
  • 7Peter Railton. Alienation, Consequentialism and the Demands of Morality [J]. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1984, (13): 72 --134.
  • 8Elizabeth Ashford. Utilitarianism, Integrity and Partiality [J]. The Journal of Philosophy, 2000, (8):421--439.
  • 9Spencer Carr. The Integrity of a Utilitarian [J]. Ethics, 1976, (4) :241--246.

二级参考文献21

  • 1Mark S. Halfon. Integrity: A Philosophical Inquiry. Philadephia: Temple University Press, 1989.
  • 2Robert Noggle. " Integrity, the Self, and Desire-Based Accounts of the Good". Philosophical Studies ,1999,96 (12).
  • 3伯纳德·威廉斯.《道德运气》,上海,上海译文出版社,2007.
  • 4Bernard Williams. "A Critique of Utilitarianism". in J. J. C. Smart and Ber- nard Williams. Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1973.
  • 5Elizabeth Ashford. "Utilitarianism, Integrity and Partiality". The Journal of Philosophy, 2000,97(8).
  • 6C. L. Ten. "Jim's Utilitarian Mission". Philosophy, 1979,54(4).
  • 7Gerald Dworkin. "Review of Utilitarianism: For and Against". Philosophical Review, 1975,84(7).
  • 8John Harris. "Williams on Negative Responsibility and Integrity". The Philosophical Quarterly, 1974, 24(7).
  • 9John Rawls. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge,MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University, 1999.
  • 10Gregory Trianosky. "Moral Integrity and Moral Psychology". Journal of Value Inquiry, 1986(20).

共引文献26

同被引文献18

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部