期刊文献+

北京市大屯地区高血压患者分级管理一年成效分析 被引量:5

Results of grading management of hypertensive patients in Datun Community of Beijing for one year
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价大屯地区高血压患者分级管理效果。方法根据高血压水平和心血管危险因素对2009年10月1日至2010年10月1日间在大屯社区就诊的2137例高血压患者进行危险度分层,并采取三级(低危、中危、高危)分层管理,监测患者血压水平、血压控制(糖尿病患者血压<130/80mmHg,非糖尿病患者血压<140/90mmHg)率、非药物治疗比例及随访依从性等指标。结果入选高血压患者基线血压控制率为58.4%,其中,低危组、中危组、高危组分别为61.7%、57.2%、59.6%;随访1年时整体血压控制率为67.5%,其中,低危组、中危组、高危组分别为79.3%、55.4%、67.5%。与基线相比,仅低危组患者1年后血压控制率具有统计学差异(P<0.01)。低危组、中危组、高危组随访依从性达标率分别为72.5%、71.4%、82.6%。高危组随访达标率明显高于其他两组(P<0.01)。年龄、受教育程度和危险分层是影响随访达标率的因素。患者规律服药率超过90%,但非药物治疗率仅在50%左右。体育锻炼、限盐、控制体重对提高血压控制率有显著影响。结论社区高血压管理提高了血压控制率和随访依从性,中危组随访和血压控制情况较差。患者非药物治疗率仍较低,需要进一步改进健康教育和指导的方式和效果。 Objective To review the results of grading management of hypertensive patients in Datun Community of Beijing.Methods The degree of risk was graded in hypertension patients(n=2137),visiting doctor in Datun Community from Oct.1,2009 to Oct.1,2010,based on their hypertension levels and cardiovascular risk factors,and managed according to three grades.The indexes including blood pressure(BP) level,control rate of BP,proportion of non-drug treatment and compliance rate of follow-up were observed.Results The control rate of baseline BP was 58.4% in selected hypertensive patients,and that was,respectively,61.7%,57.2% and 59.6% in low-risk group,average-risk group and high-risk group.After follow-up for one year,the control rate of BP was 67.5%,and that was,respectively,79.3%,55.4% and 67.5% in low-risk group,average-risk group and high-risk group.There was statistical difference in the control rate of BP only in low-risk group compared with baseline BP(P〈0.01) after one year.The compliance rate of follow-up was,respectively,72.5%,71.4% and 82.6% in low-risk group,average-risk group and high-risk group,and that was higher in high-risk group than that in other two groups(P〈0.01).Age,education background and risk grading were factors influencing the compliance rate of follow-up.The proportion of patients taking drugs regularly was over 90%,but that of patients with non-drug treatment was only around 50%.Physical exercises,salt limitation and weight control had significant effects on the control rate of BP.Conclusion Community management of hypertension has improved the control rate of BP and follow-up compliance,but which was poor in average-risk group.The proportion of patients with non-drug treatment is still lower,and the methods and achievements should be improved in health education and guiding.
出处 《中国循证心血管医学杂志》 2012年第2期118-121,共4页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Cardiovascular Medicine
关键词 高血压 分级管理 随访 社区 Hypertension Grading management Follow-up Community
  • 引文网络
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献18

共引文献890

同被引文献29

  • 1傅东波,杨柯君,王敬丽,孙玮,滕秀琴,丁永明,傅华.社区高血压自我管理模式及血压控制效果分析[J].中国健康教育,2004,20(10):869-872. 被引量:52
  • 2Scott JC, Robertson BJ. Kaiser Colorado' s Cooperative Health Cre Clinic :a group approach to Patient care[ J. Manag Care Q, 1996.4 (3) :41 -.5.
  • 3He J, Gu D, Wu X, et al. Major Causes of Death among Men and Women in China. N Engl J Med. 2005, 353:1124 - 1134.
  • 4Neal B, MacMahon S, Chapman N, et al. Effects of ACE inhibitors, calcium antagonists, and other blood - pressure - lowering drugs : results of prospectively designed overviews of randomised trials. Blood Pressure Lowering Treatment Trialists' Collaboration. Lancet, 2000,356 : 1955 - 1964.
  • 5田镇安,刘志明,刘海波.297例高血压患者服药依从性调查分析.2004,7(19):1430.
  • 6邝惠容,黄洁贞,李海英.澳门社区老年高血压患者健康促进生活方式的调查分析.2008,43(4):306-308.
  • 7中国高血压防治指南修订委员会.中国高血压防治指(2005修订版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.
  • 8Gao Y, Chen G, Tian H, et al. Prevalence of hypertension in china: a cross-sectional study[J/OL]. 2013 Jun 11.http://www.plosone.org/ article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal, pone. 0065938.
  • 9浙江省卫生厅疾控处.关于印发浙江省高血压社区综合防治工作规范(试行)的通知[EB].2010-01-25.http://www.zjwst.gov.cn/art/2010/1/25/art_262_75565.html.
  • 10中国人民共和国卫生部疾病控制司.中国成人超重和肥胖症预防控制指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.

引证文献5

二级引证文献35

;
使用帮助 返回顶部