摘要
由于参与法律活动的人的角色不同,因而其法律推理的目的、采用的方法也不尽相同。作为私权捍卫者的律师应当竭力为委托人的利益服务,作为制度权威言说者的法官有责任作出正当的裁判,承担教学和学术角色的法学教授则应成为法律智慧的启发者和学术知识的增量扩充者。不同角色主体的参与、争辩、对话,是聚向善治的生命活水和智慧溪流。
Different role in legal matters affects main objectives and methods in legal reasoning.Lawyer as defender of private rights ought to do their utmost to help his client,The judge as spokesman of institutional authority have responsibility in legitimate judgment,Legal professor as taking teach and engaging in studies should enlight wisdom.Conversation in different subject lead to good governance.
出处
《行政与法》
2012年第5期106-109,共4页
Administration and Law
基金
高等学校优秀青年教师国内访问学者项目经费资助
关键词
法律推理
律师
法官
法学教师
legal reasoning
lawyer
the judge
legal professor
