期刊文献+

简论教学过程中的客体抽象与反身抽象 被引量:1

A Brief Discussion on Objective Abstraction and Reflective Abstraction in the Process of Teaching
下载PDF
导出
摘要 教学过程是一个认识过程,也是一个行动过程。教学过程要求思维抽象,即要求思维过程的客体抽象与反身抽象。客体抽象是基于事实的抽象或基于感性经验的抽象,是从事物的多维具体特征中,通过思维活动抽取出事物的本质特征、本质联系及其运动变化规律。反身抽象是基于主体活动间协调的抽象,是把顺序、关系从动作中分离出来,把形式从内容中分离出来的抽象,继而发展为对纯符号的抽象,或者说对抽象的抽象,形成数理逻辑与形式逻辑。教学过程中要做到客体抽象与反身抽象的协调,并把思维抽象与事实直观统一起来。 Teaching process is both a process of knowing and a process of doing. This process calls for mental abstraction, that is, objective abstraction and reflective abstraction in the course of thinking. Objective abstraction refers to an abstraction based on the fact or on sensitive experience. In other words, it generalizes the essential qualities, essential relations and law of motion of things from their multiple concrete features by mental activity. On the other hand, reflective abstraction means abstraction based on coordination between the subject' s actions. Spe- cifically, this type of abstraction separates the order and relation from acts and the form from contents, which continues to develop into an abstraction of pure symbols or an abstraction of abstraction and turn into mathematic logic and formal logic. Therefore, teaching process should help to coordinate objective abstraction with reflective abstraction to integrate mental abstraction with actual facts.
出处 《陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期167-170,共4页 Journal of Shaanxi Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 教学过程 客体抽象 反身抽象 teaching process objective abstraction reflective abstraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献3

  • 1Peggy A. Ertmer & Timothy J. Newby (1993). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from an Instructional Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4) ppS0-72.
  • 2.[EB/OL].http://vcs.ccc.cccd. edu/crs/special/ertnewl.htm,.
  • 3[德]康德 著,蓝公武.纯粹理性批判[M]商务印书馆,1960.

共引文献1839

同被引文献19

引证文献1

二级引证文献77

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部