期刊文献+

电子病历系统评价的未来展望 被引量:2

Future Prospect of Electronic Medical Record Assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 卫生部医政司组织进行的2011年试点医院电子病历系统应用水平分级评价工作已告一段落。根据国内外文献综述及各方人士对本次评价工作的反馈,重点阐述了未来电子病历系统评价会有怎样的变化,将沿哪些方向继续发展等。 2011 Evaluation of EMRs Functional Grading in experimental hospitals selected by Medical Administration Department MOH China has finally declared the ending. Based on literature review home and abroad, and feedback of attendees of this evaluation the author describes a vision of future trend and development of EMRs evaluation in China.
作者 舒婷 杨威
出处 《中国数字医学》 2012年第5期25-27,共3页 China Digital Medicine
关键词 电子病历系统 评价 展望 EMRs, evaluation, vision
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献10

  • 1HIMSS Analytics.U.S.EMK Adoption Model SM Trends.[2011-06-28].WWW.himssanalyfics.org.
  • 2HIMSS Analytics.EMIL Sophistication Correlates to Hospital Quality Data.[2011-06-28].http:llwww.himss.org/content/files/UHCresearch.pdf.
  • 3National Quality Forum. Health Information Technology Automation of Quality Measurement:Quality Data Set and Data Flow.Washington DC: National Quality Forum,2009.
  • 4Tang PC,Ralston M,Arrigotti MF,et al.Comparison of Methodologies for Calculating Quality Measures Based on Administrative Data versus Clinical Data from an Electronic Health Record System:Implications for Performance Measures.J Am Med Inform Assoc,2007,14(1):10-15.
  • 5Bates DW,Pappius E,Kuperman GJ,et al. Using information systems to measure and improve quality.Int J Med Inform,1999,53(2-3):115-124.
  • 6Centers For Medicare and Medicaid services.CMS EMR Meaningful Use Overview. [2011-06-28].https://www.ems.gov/ EHRlncentivePrograms/30_Meaningful Use. asp,.
  • 7National Quality Forum.National Quality Forum Homepage. [2011-06-28].http://www. qualityforum.org/Home.aspx.
  • 8American Medical Association.Health Quality Measures Format. [2011-06-28]. http : / / www.ama-assn.org/ resources/ doc / cqi/ coUaborative-hqmf-0409,pdf.
  • 9Health Levd Seven International. Standards in Clinical Decision Support:Activities in Health Level Seven And Beyond.[2011-06-28] .http:/Iwww.hlT.org/documentcenter/ public_temp_EA4547EE-IC23-BAI7-0CF522518467FD38/wg/dss/2009-11-14-AMIA-Symposium-CDS-workshop.pdf.
  • 10Agency of Health Research and Quality. Agency of Health Research and Quality Homepage. [2011-06-28].http://www.ah rq. gov/.

共引文献9

同被引文献47

  • 1王羽.电子病历系统功能应用水平分级评价方法及标准解读[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2012..
  • 2LIU L P, MA Q X. The impact of service level on the accept- ance of application service oriented medical records [J]. Infor- mation : Management, 2005, 42(8): 1121-1135.
  • 3CHAN L, AMER M, ALDHABAN F. Adoption : evalua- tion of personal health record (PHR) system [C]//Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering Technology, 2009. PICMET 2009. Portland, OR: 2009: 2986-2999.
  • 4VISHWANATH A, SCAMURRA S D. Barriers to the adop- tion of electronic health records: using concept.mapping to de- velop a comprehensive empirical model [J]. Health lnformat- icsJ, 2007, 13(2): 119-134.
  • 5HYUN S, JOHNSON S B, STETSON P D, et al. Develop- ment and evaluation of nursing user interface screens using multiple methods [J]. J Biomed Inform, 2009, 42(6) : 1004- 1012.
  • 6YARBROUGH A K, SMITH T B. Technology acceptance a- mong physicians: a new take on TAM [J]. Med Care Res Rev, 2007, 64(6): 650-672.
  • 7MORTON M E, WIEDENBECK S. A framework for predic- ting EHR adoption attitudes: a physician survey rJ:. Per- spect Health Inf Manag, 2009, 6: la.
  • 8ASH J S. Factors affecting the diffusion of the Computer- Based Patient Record [C]//Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Fall Symposium. Bethesda: 1997: 682-686.
  • 9SPIL T, KATSMA C P, STEGWEE R A, et al. Value, par- ticipation and quality of electronic health records in the Neth- erlands EC:// 43rd Hawaii International Conference on Sys- tem Sciences. New York,USA: 2010: 1-10.
  • 10WII.KINS M A. Factors influencing acceptance of electronic health records in hospitals[J]. Perspect Health Inf Manag, 2009, 6: lf.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部