期刊文献+

公共环境政策如何影响消费者行为——来自中国限制塑料袋使用政策的自然实验证据

How Public Environmental Policies Affect Consumer Behavior?——Natural Experiment Evidence from Plastic Bag Regulation of China
原文传递
导出
摘要 以减少塑料袋垃圾为目标,我国于2008年6月执行了强制全国所有商品零售商对塑料购物袋收费的政策。本研究以该政策的执行为契机,运用自然实验研究方法,在政策执行前后分别开展大规模调查,以收集个人消费者塑料袋消费行为信息,从而获得独特数据,对这项涉及面极广的公共环境政策对消费者行为的影响进行定量分析。结果表明,塑料袋消费量的减幅在完全执行政策的超市达到近80%,而在未完全执行政策的农贸市场也接近60%,并且政策执行使与塑料袋消费相关的塑料袋使用效率、替代品使用行为等也发生了显著变化。此外,政策执行力度、消费者对政策的态度以及消费者的社会经济特征也显著影响塑料袋消费,而且该政策的影响在不同消费者群体、不同地区及不同类型购物场所存在显著差异。 China introduced a nationwide regulation requiring all retailers to charge for plastic shopping bags on June 1, 2008, with the aim of reducing plastic bag litter. Using the policy implementation as a natural experiment and collecting individual-level data before and after the implementation, the author obtained unique data to investigate the impacts of the broadly implemented regulation on consumers~ bag consumption behavior. The author finds that the regulation implementation achieved a nearly 80% reduction in bag consumption in supermarkets with perfect enforcement and a nearly 60% bag reduction in open markets with imperfect enforcement. It also caused significant changes in behaviors related to bag consumption. Besides regulation enforcement, consumersattitude toward the regulation and consumers' socioeconomic characteristics also affected hag consumption. However, the regulation effects varied largely among consumer groups, regions and shopping occasions.
作者 何浩然
出处 《财贸经济》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第6期105-115,共11页 Finance & Trade Economics
基金 瑞典海外发展合作研究署 环保公益性行业科研专项(201009066)项目 北京师范大学985工程科学发展观与经济可持续发展研究平台专项建设项目
关键词 消费者行为 公共政策工具 政策效果 自然实验 塑料袋 Consumer Behavior, Public Policy Instrument, Policy Impact, Natural Experiment,Plastic Bag
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1何浩然,陈安来.中国限制塑料袋使用的政策效果及国际经验借鉴[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2010,20(11):167-174. 被引量:8
  • 2江国成.《每天用掉20亿个-中国塑料袋消耗巨大污染惊人》,人民网,2008年1月10日.
  • 3王优玲.《我国平均每天生产塑料购物袋消耗石油至少13000多吨》,新华网,2008年6月5日.
  • 4中共中央组织部.《2008年中国共产党党内统计公报》,中共党史出版社2009年版.
  • 5国家发展和改革委员会.《发展改革委就限制生产销售使用塑料购物袋答问》,中央政府网,2008年3月1日.
  • 6国家发展和改革委员会.《国家发展改革委公告》,2008年第33号.
  • 7商务部、国家发展和改革委员会、国家工商行政管理总局.《商品零售场所塑料购物袋有偿使用管理办法》,2008年第8号.
  • 8Ackerman, F. , Why Do We Recycle: Markets, Values, and Public Policy. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press,1997.
  • 9Briassoulis, H. , Policy Oriented Integrated Analysis of Land-Use Change= An Analysis of Data Needs. Environmental Management, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2001 ,pp. 1-11.
  • 10Cameron, A. C. , and P. K. Trivedi, Econometric Models Based on Count Data: Comparisons and Applications of Some Estimators and Tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1986, pp. 29-53.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Frank Convery,Simon McDonnell,Susana Ferreira.The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics . 2007 (1)
  • 2Fehily,Timoney&Company.Consultancy Study on Plastic Bags. . 1999
  • 3McDonnell Simon.An Enquiryintothe Use of Environmental Taxation onEnvironmentally Harmful Products:ACase Study of the Irish Plastic BagLevy. . 2003
  • 4The Litter Monitoring Body.The National Litter Pollution MonitoringSystem-system result. http://www.litter.ie/system-survey-results/index.shtml . 2009
  • 5McDonnell Simon.The Irish Plastic Bag Levy-A Review of itsPerformance 5 years on. the EAERE16thAnnualmeeting . 2008
  • 6Wilson D,Smit M.The Plastic Bag Regulations 2003-An Overviewofthe Possible Impacts on the Industries in the Plastic Bag Value Chain. . 2002
  • 7Hasson R,Leiman A,Visser M.The Economics of Plastic BagLegislation in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics . 2007
  • 8Statistics South Africa.Overview of the Plastic Bag Agreement. http://www.environment.gov.za/hotissues/2003apr30/overview-plastic-bag-29042003.html . 2003
  • 9Gosling M.Thin Plastic Bags used in Cape Town,Despite Ban. Cape Times . 2004
  • 10Glazewski J.Plastic Bag Issue Teaches a Lesson. Business Day . 2003

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部