期刊文献+

非均布荷载作用下震后地下拱结构抗动载能力评估 被引量:2

RESIDUAL DYNAMIC RESISTANCE ASSESSMENT OF SEISMIC DAMAGED UNDERGROUND ARCH UNDER NON-UNIFORM EXPLOSION LOADING
原文传递
导出
摘要 为评估非均布荷载作用下震后地下防护结构的抗动载能力,针对震前震后三种结构型式,给出了动荷载动力系数的确定方法,推导出了非均布荷载作用下地下拱形结构的弯矩和拱脚推力的计算公式。针对工程实例,计算了不同损伤型式的拱结构承受非均布动载时的结构内力,从而给出了非均布荷载作用下震后结构的抗动载能力评估方法。研究表明:抗弯设计条件下震后拱结构抗非均布动载能力将降低约13%,而在抗剪设计条件下由于裂缝的穿透震后拱结构抗非均布动载能力将降低50%以上。 For the sake of the ability assesment of anti non-uniform dynamic loading of the damaged structure after earthquake, simplified structural models for damaged arches, including two-hinged and three-hinged arches, were built according to the damage modes and distributions. Residual dynamic resistances of seismic damaged underground arches were calculated by an equivalent static load method. Through an example, moments of arches with different constraints were calculated under non-uniform explosion loading, as well as the thrust force at the foot of the arches. Then the ability of anti-dynamic loads of the damaged structure after eartheuake was evaluated. It is concluded that under non-uniform explosion loading the load capapcity of the damaged arch drops at a level of 13 percent or even 50 percent when controled by bending or shear resistance, respectively.
出处 《工程力学》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第A01期119-123,140,共6页 Engineering Mechanics
基金 国家自然科学基金创新研究群体科学基金项目(51021001) 国家自然科学基金项目(51078351) 先进建筑材料四川省重点实验室(西南科技大学)开放基金项目(09zxxk05) 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部实验室(河海大学)开放基金项目(GH200905) 抗震工程技术四川省重点实验室(西南交通大学)开放基金项目
关键词 地下拱结构 地震损伤 非均布动载 剩余承载能力 损伤评估 underground protective arch seismic damage non-uniform explosion loading residual dynamicresistance damaged assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1周健南,金丰年,范华林,浦奎英,许宏发.震后地下拱结构的抗冲击波动载能力评估[J].工程力学,2012,29(2):159-164. 被引量:8
  • 2The Design of Structures to Resist the Effects of Atomic Weapons. EM 1110-345-414 to 421 [R]. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, for Office of the Chief of Engineers, U. S. Army, Washington, D. C.; 15 March 1957; Unclassified.
  • 3Robbins D Y. Analysis Report for Basic Types of Underground Structures [R]. Contract No. DA-22-079-eng-196 with Holmes and Narver, Inc., U. S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg, Mississippi; Secret, Restricted Data. October 1956.
  • 4范华林,金丰年,许宏发,周健南.汶川地震巾地下(国防/人防)工程结构破坏特征分析[c].纪念汶川地震一周年抗震减灾专题学术讨论会,成都,2009.
  • 5Fundamentals of protective design for conventionalweapons. TM5-855-1.U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station [S]. Vicksburg, Miss., Jul. 1984.
  • 6Krauthammer T, Puglisi R D. Simplified analysis of buried reinforced concrete arches under simulated nuclear loads [J]. Computers & Structures, 1992, 43: 1029-- 1039.
  • 7Stevens D J, Krauthammer T. Analysis of blast-loaded, buried arch response. Part I: Numerical approach [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991, 117: 197--211.
  • 8Stevens D J, Krauthammer T, Chandra D. Analysis of blast-loaded, buried arch response. Part Ⅱ: Application [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991, 117: 213--234.
  • 9Dharaneepathy M V, Kewava Rao M N, Santhakumar A R. The influence of geometry on the blast response of circular arches [J]. Computers & Structures, 1992, 45: 755--763.
  • 10Weidlinger P, Hinman E. Analysis of underground protective structures [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1988, 114: 1658-- 1673.

二级参考文献13

  • 1Takashi Matsuda, et al. A study on damage of underground subway structures during the 1995 HYOGO-KEN NAMBU earthquake [C]. Geotechnical Engineering in Recovery from Earthquake Disaster, KIG-Forum, 1997.
  • 2Susumu Nakamura, et al. Investigation, analysis and restoration of the collapsed DAIKAI subway station during the 1995 HYOGO-KEN NAMBU earthquake [C]. Proceeding of JSCE, 1995.
  • 3Hayashi Y, Tamura K, Mori M, Takahashi I. Simulation analyses of buildings damaged in the 1995 Kobe, Japan, Earthquake considering soil-structure interaction [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1997, 28(4): 371-391.
  • 4An X, Shawky A A, Maekawa K. The collapse mechanism of a subway station during the Great Hanshin Earthquake [J]. Cement and Concrete Composites, 1997, 19(3): 241-257.
  • 5Hashash Y M A, Hook J J, Schmidt B, et al. Seismic design and analysis of underground structures [J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 2001, 16(4): 247-293.
  • 6John C M, Zahrah T F. Aseismic design of underground structures [J]. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology, 1987, 2(2): 165- 197.
  • 7Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons. TM5-855-1. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station [S]. Vicksburg, Miss., Jul. 1984.
  • 8Krauthammer T, Puglisi R D. Simplified analysis of buried reinforced concrete arches under simulated nuclear loads [J]. Computers & Structures, 1992, 43: 1029- 1039.
  • 9Stevens D J, Krauthammer T. Analysis of blast-loaded, buried arch response. Part I: numerical approach [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 1991, 117: 197-212.
  • 10Stevens D J, Krauthammer T, Chandra D. Analysis of blast-loaded, buried arch response. Part II: application [J]. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 1991, 117: 213 -234.

共引文献7

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部