期刊文献+

306例β-内酰胺类抗菌药物不良反应报告分析 被引量:11

Adverse drug reaction reports analyses of β-lactams antibacterial drugs in 306 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解我院β-内酰胺类抗菌药物不良反应(ADR)发生的情况和特点,为临床安全、合理用药提供参考。方法收集我院β-内酰胺类抗菌药物ADR报告306例,按患者年龄、性别、涉及药物种类、给药方式、ADR发生时间、ADR损害器官、主要临床表现、关联性评价等,进行信息汇总、分析。结果 306例报告中,男145例,女161例。2~20岁发生率最高(39.21%)。涉及6类β-内酰胺类药物,以头孢菌素类为主(169例,占55.23%),β-内酰胺酶抑制剂复合制剂次之(80例,占36.14%)。引起ADR的主要给药途径为静脉给药(280例,占91.5%)。ADR主要损害器官为皮肤及其附件损害,占55.23%;新的、严重的ADR报告62例,占20.26%。关联性评价都为"可能"以上,其中"肯定"报告22例。结论加强医院β-内酰胺类抗菌药物ADR的报告和监测工作,及时总结有价值的ADR报告信息并通报给临床,可以避免或减少其ADR的重复发生,提高临床用药水平,节约患者的治疗成本。 Objective To understand the occurrence and characteristics of adverse drug reaction(ADR)of β-lactams antibacterial drugs in our hospital,and provide reference for safe and rational drug use in clinic.Methods 306 ADR reports were collected and analyzed according to the patient′s age and gender,drug types,medication method,ADR time,damage to organs,major clinical manifestations and relevance.Results There were 145 males and 161 females in 306 ADR reports.The occurrence rate was highest in 2~20 year-old patients(39.21%).Six kinds of β-lactams were involved with cephalosporin in first place(169 cases,55.23%).β-lactamase inhibitors compounds took second place(36.14%).Intravenous administration was the main route(280 cases,91.5%).The main organs damaged by ADR were skin and its attachments(55.23%).There were 62 cases(20.26%)of new and serious ADR reports.The relevance of all reports was more than"possible"by relevance evaluation with 22"sure" reports.Conclusion The ADR report for β-lactams should be strengthened,and the valuable ADR report information should be summarized and communicated to clinic as soon as possible to avoid or reduce the reoccurrence of ADR,improve clinic drug use,and save the treatment costs of patients.
出处 《实用药物与临床》 CAS 2012年第5期290-293,共4页 Practical Pharmacy and Clinical Remedies
关键词 药品不良反应 Β-内酰胺类抗菌药物 安全用药 分析 监测 Adverse drug reaction(ADR) β-lactams Safe medication Analysis Monitor
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献53

共引文献258

同被引文献111

  • 1邹大进.糖尿病治疗中的药物经济学[J].中华医学信息导报,2003(24):18-18. 被引量:6
  • 2李忠忠,刘亚非.注射用阿莫西林-舒巴坦钠致过敏性休克1例[J].中国现代应用药学,2006,23(3):192-192. 被引量:5
  • 3社区获得性肺炎诊断和治疗指南[J].中华结核和呼吸杂志,2006,29(10):651-655. 被引量:3052
  • 4王伟.我院抗菌药物不良反应报告分析[J].中国药师,2006,9(11):1071-1072. 被引量:12
  • 5陈新谦,金有豫,汤光.新编药物学[M].第17版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2011:32-33.
  • 6卫生部.药品不良反应报告和监测管理办法[S].2011.
  • 7Garcia Rodriguez LA, Duque A, Castellsague J, et al. A cohort study on the risk of acute liver injury amomg users of ketocon- azole and other antifungal drugs [ J ]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 1999,48 ( 6 ) : 847.
  • 8Pascual A, Calandra T, Bolay S, et al. Voriconazole therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with invasive mycoses improves ef- ficacy and safety outcomes- J 1- Clin Infect Dis,2008,46 (2) : 201.
  • 9Yi F,Ge L,Zhao J,et al.Meta-analysis:total parenteral nutrition versus total enteral nutrition in predicted severe acute pancreatitis[J].Internal medicine,2012,51(6):523-530.
  • 10Wang SQ,Feng QX,Li SJ,et al.The day when infection is confirmed is a better time point for mortality prediction in patients with severe acute pancreatitis[J].Pancreas,2012,41(4):605-610.

引证文献11

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部