期刊文献+

远程开放教育系统中半开卷考试模式的形成与发展 被引量:5

The Formation and Development of the Semi-Open-Book Examination in Distance Education and the Open University System in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 半开卷考试是一种有利有弊的考核方式,电大系统是一个不同于其他院校的开放教育体系,需要借助远程教育教师团队的力量,结合自主学习和协作学习两者的长处,将半开卷考试模式的优势最大化。本文通过实验、问卷调查和访谈的方式,阐述电大系统开放教育半开卷考试模式的形成与发展历程,并研究半开卷考试背景下如何通过建立和完善开放教育教师团队,充分发挥半开卷考试模式的优势。 Through continuous quality assurance and a recent review of alternative assessment methods, findings in China have suggested that the semi-open-book (Open-A4) examination is more suitable than other methods in adult distance education. This method is effective in supporting and improving independent learning and collaborative learn- ing, and promotes efficient use of knowledge. As an innovation by the Open University of China ( OUC ) , the Open-A4 examination method will accelerate the social and academic validity of distance education. However, it should be real- ized that Open-A4 examination is an assessment mode with both its advantages and disadvantages. OUC System is an open education system different from other universities and colleges. It is necessary to sufficiently bring Open-A4 exami- nation "s advantages into play by accelerating the effectiveness of students" autonomous learning and cooperative learn- ing with the help of teacher community in open and distance education system in China. This paper, through empiri- cal research, surveys and interviews, presents the results from using the Open-A4 examination extensively in China over the past ten years. We discuss the training of teachers as well as the achieved quality of learning and student satisfac- tion, and also present the correlations found between the Open-A4 examination in China and the characteristics of open and distance education.
作者 张宇光
出处 《开放教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第3期67-75,共9页 Open Education Research
关键词 半开卷考试模式 远程开放教育系统 一页纸考试形式 教师团队 semi-open-book examination open and distance education system open-A4 examination method teacher community
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1陈军.开放教育半开卷考试的探索与思考[J].江苏广播电视大学学报,2010,21(2):14-16. 被引量:2
  • 2Dickson, K. L. ,& Miller, M. D. (2005). Authorized crib cards do not improve exam performance [ J]. Teaching of Psychology, (32) :230-232.
  • 3Dickson, K. L. , & Bauer, J.J. (2008). Do students learn course material during crib sheet construction? [ J ]. Teaching of Psychol- ogy, (35) :117-120.
  • 4Dorsel, T. N. ,& Cundiff, G. W. (1979). The cheat-sheet: Efficient coding device or indispensable crutch? [ J]. Journal of Experi- mental Education, (38) :39-41.
  • 5Drake, V. K., Freed, P. ,& Hunter, J. M. (1998). Crib sheets or security blankets? [ J ]. Issues of Mental Health Nursing, (19) :291-300.
  • 6Fullan, M. ( 2000 ). The return of large scale reform [ J ]. Journal of Educational Change, ( 1 ) :5-28.
  • 7高瑞.乌鲁木齐市广播电视大学半开卷考试试点初探[J].新疆广播电视大学学报,2007,11(2):48-49. 被引量:1
  • 8Hamed, K.M. (2008). Do you prefer to have the text or a sheet with your physics exams? [ J ]. The Physics Teacher, (46) : 290 -293.
  • 9Hindman, C.D. (1980). Crib notes in the classroom: Cheaters never win [ J ]. Teaching of Psychology, 7 (3) :166-168.
  • 10Kember, D. , & Murphy, D. ( 1990 ). Alternative new directions forinstructional design[ J]. Educational Technology,30(18) :42-47.

二级参考文献38

共引文献48

同被引文献25

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部