摘要
"逃逸"的本质是遗弃,交通肇事后逃逸所构成的交通肇事罪属故意犯罪,而非过失犯罪。最高人民法院有关以交通肇事罪共犯论处的司法解释并无不当。交通肇事罪既可由过失构成,也可由故意构成。没有必要增设交通肇事逃逸罪。
“Escaping”means deserting,and traffic accident after a traffic accident constitutes the crime of es- caping is a deliberate crime, rather than criminal negligence. The judicial interpretation of the crime of the Supreme People＇s Court punished as an accomplice is not inappropriate. Subjective aspects of traffic offense constitutes either by negligence, but also by intentional composition. There is no need for an additional hit and run crime.
出处
《政法论丛》
CSSCI
2012年第3期117-123,共7页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
中国法学会2011年度法学研究课题:"依法办事"与中国传统司法理念的现代转换(CLS[2011]D05)
北京市法学会2011年度法学研究专项课题:中国传统执法理念的现代转换(BLS[2011]C002)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
交通肇事罪逃逸共犯结合犯
traffic offense
escaping
accomplice
combinative offense
