期刊文献+

经尿道电切术治疗高龄高危前列腺增生症 被引量:11

Transurethral Resection of Prostate for BPH in Senior High Risk Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨经尿道前列腺电切术治疗高龄高危前列腺增生症的安全性和疗效。方法:对132例80岁以上高危良性前列腺增生症患者行经尿道前列腺电切术。患者手术时间30~60min,平均(40±3)min。术中未发生经尿道电切综合征、大出血。结果:随访3~72个月,平均(16±2)个月。国际前列腺症状评分平均值由术前(21.5±6.9)分降到(9.3±4.2)分,最大尿流率(MFR)由(6.8±1.3)ml/s增加至(17.8±2.5)ml/s。生活质量评分(QOL)由(5.5±1.4)分降至(3.1±0.5)分,残余尿量(PVR)由(160±5)ml降至(25±1.5)ml,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。全部病例术后均排尿通畅,术后均未有心、脑、肝、肾等系统疾病加重。结论:只要术前积极控制并发症,医师技术娴熟,经尿道前列腺电气化切除术是当今治疗80岁以上高危前列腺增生症的安全、有效的方法。 Objective :To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) in senior high risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH).Methods :A total of 138 patients, all aged over 80 years, with benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent TURP in our institution.The average operation time was (40±3)rain, range : 30-60 rain.No transurethral resection syndrome or massive bleeding occurred during the operation.Results :All patients were followed up for 3 to 72 months, mean : (16±2)months.The International Prostate Symptom Score(SPSS) decreased from 21.5±6.9 to 9.3±4.2, Quality of Life(QOL) from 5.5±1.4 to 3.1±0.5 and postvoid residual volume(PVR) from (160±5)ml to (25±1.5)ml, whereas maximum urinary flow-rate increased from (6.8±1.3)ml/s to (17.8±2.5)ml/s.All differences were statistically significant(P〈0.05).Postoperatively, all patients had fluent urination.No further damage to heart, brain, liver, kidney or other systems were observed in any patient.Conclusion :Performed by an experienced urologist with proper perioperative management, TURP is a safe and effective treatment modality in senior high risk patients.
出处 《中外医学研究》 2012年第16期1-3,共3页 CHINESE AND FOREIGN MEDICAL RESEARCH
关键词 前列腺增生症 经尿道前列腺电切术 高龄高危 Benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) Transurethral resection of prostate(TURP) Senior high risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献16

  • 1洪宝发,蔡伟,符伟军,杨勇,王威,陈耀富,展洁,张翠娥,李炎唐,崔胜堂.选择性绿激光汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(1):17-19. 被引量:90
  • 2陈建华,盛申耀,凌春华,朱荣旋,蒋鹤鸣.经尿道电切前列腺综合征九例报告[J].临床泌尿外科杂志,1994,9(4):198-199. 被引量:22
  • 3李爱华,那建菱.TUVP术围手术期的生理变化与麻醉[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2001,6(2):7-9. 被引量:2
  • 4Uchida T,Ohori M,Soh S,et al.Factors influencing morbidity in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.Urology,1999 ,53:98-105.
  • 5Anson K.Could the latest generation potassium titanyl phosphate lasers be the ones to make transurethral resection of the prostate an operation of historical interest only? Curr Opin Urol,2004,14:27-29.
  • 6Shingleton WB,Terrell F,Renfroe L,et al.Low-power vs high-power KTP laser:improved method of laser ablation of prostate.J Endourol,1999,13:49-52.
  • 7Hai MA,Malek RS.Photoselective vaporization of the prostate :initial experience with a new 80 W KTP laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.J Endourol,2003 ,17 :93-96.
  • 8Reich O,Bachmann A,Schneede P,et al.Experimental comparison of high power (80 W) potassium titanyl phosphate laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate.J Urol,2004,171 (6 Pt1) :2502-2504.
  • 9Malek RS,Kuntzman RS,Barrett DM.High power potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization prostatectomy.J Urol,2000,163:1730-1733.
  • 10Te AE,Malloy TR,Stein BS,et al.Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia:12-month results from the first United States multicenter prospective trial.J Urol,2004,172(4 Pt 1) :1404-1408.

共引文献687

同被引文献83

引证文献11

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部