摘要
在陪审制发展过程中总是伴随着对职业法官司法的批评以及对普通大众司法的批评,这种对立意见表现的是对两种司法模式中执掌权力之人的不信任。为协调这种冲突,丹麦在有利于发挥陪审制的作用、有利于保障被告人的合法权益的原则之下既保留陪审团制、又实施参审制,发展出独具特色的陪审制模式。
Development of jury system has always been accompanied with criticism of justice by professional judges and criticism of justice by ordinary mass. Such opposed positions reflect mistrust of those in control of power in the aforesaid two modes of justice. In order to mediate the conflict, Denmark has developed a unique jury system which keeps jury trial while applying mixed court system under the principle that legitimate interest of defendant should be protected and jury system should play an active role
出处
《聊城大学学报(社会科学版)》
2012年第3期69-73,共5页
Journal of Liaocheng University:Social Science Edition
关键词
司法
不信任
丹麦陪审制
Justice
mistrust
Danish jury system