期刊文献+

超声造影在移植肾排斥反应中的诊断价值 被引量:2

The diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in renal allograft rejection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观测移植肾排斥反应的超声造影特点,分析造影图像,寻求超声造影诊断移植肾排斥反应的定量指标。方法选取患者30例,将患者分为A、B两组,A组20例肾功能异常和B组10例移植肾功能正常患者分别进行常规超声检查和超声造影检查,观察造影时微循环灌注情况并应用造影分析软件对感兴趣区域分析定量指标曲线下面积AUC(Area Under The Curve),然后进行统计分析。结果 A组移植肾微循环的灌注明显比B组差;A组与B组的分析指标AUC差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论超声造影可以动态检测移植肾发生排斥反应时微循环灌注的改变;定量指标AUC为诊断移植肾排斥反应提供了较为可靠、客观的影像学依据。 Objective To observe characteristics of the renal allograft rejection in contrast-enhanced ultrasound and to analyse ultrasonic imaging and seek for the quantitative index of the diagnosis of the renal allograft rejection.Methods There were 20 cases of renal transplant patients with abnormality in group A and 10 cases in group B with normality,A and B were conducted normal routine ultrasound examination and contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination.The imaging of microcirculation was swreyed,and then perfusion application was analyed uwing software to the interested region to analyse quantitative index AUC(Area Under The Curve),and statistical analysis was performed.Results Graft microcirculation infusion in group B was obviously better than that in group A;Analytical indicator(AUC) of group A and group B was statistically significant differences(P0.05).Conclusion Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging can detect dynamically the changes of the graft microcirculation perfusion;Quantitative index(AUC) for diagnosis of renal allograft rejection provides a more reliable and objective imaging basis.
出处 《医学影像学杂志》 2012年第3期479-481,共3页 Journal of Medical Imaging
基金 山东省自然科学基金资助(编号:2R2011HL024)
关键词 移植肾 排斥反应 微循环 超声造影 Renal allograft Rejection Microcirculation Ultrasound imaging
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Merville P. Combating chronic renal allografc dysfunction; optimal immunosuppressive regimens [J]. Drugs, 2005, 65: 615-631.
  • 2Cosgrove D1. Ultrasound contrast agent s: an overview [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2006, 60: 324-330.
  • 3Marret H, Brewer M, Giraudeau B, et al. Assessment of cy- clic changes of microvessels in ovine ovaries using sonovue contrast-enhanced ultrasound [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2006, 32, 163-169.
  • 4Luo W, Zhou X, Ren X, et al. Enhancing effects of sonovue, amicrobubble sonographic contrast agent, on high- intensity focused ultrasound ablation in rabbit livers in vivo [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2007, 26: 469-476.
  • 5Piscaglia F, Bolondi L. The safety of sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations [J]. Ultresound Med Biol, 2006, 32: 1369-1375.
  • 6邢晋放,杜联芳,姜露莹,何颖倩,李凡.移植肾慢性排斥的SonoVue超声造影临床研究[J].中国医学影像技术,2008,24(5):728-730. 被引量:19

二级参考文献6

  • 1Luo W, Zhou X, Ren X, et al. Enhancing effects of SonoVue, a microbubble sonographic contrast agent, on high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation in rabbit livers in vivo. J Ultrasound Med, 2007,26(4) :469-476.
  • 2Marret H, Brewer M, Giraudeau B, et al. Assessment of cyclic changes of microvessels in ovine ovaries using SonoVue contrastenhanced ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2006,32(2) : 163-169.
  • 3Piscaglia F, Bolondi L. The safety of SonoVue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2006,32(9) : 1369-1375.
  • 4Quaia E, Degobbis F, Tona G, et al. Differential patterns of contrast enhancement in different focal liver lesions after injection of the microbubble. US contrast agent SonoVue. Radiol Med, 2004, 107(3) : 155-165.
  • 5Anders Nilsson. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the kidneys. Eur Radio Suppl, 2004, 14 (Suppl 8) : 104-109.
  • 6Cosgrove D. Ultrasound contrast agents: an overview. Eur J Radiol, 2006,60(3) :324-330.

共引文献18

同被引文献32

  • 1王晶,朱建平,蒋彦.超声造影在移植肾急性排斥中的应用[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(5):1008-1014. 被引量:13
  • 2Chudek J,Kolonko A,Król R. The intrarenal vascular resistance parameters measured by duplex Doppler ultrasound shortly after kidney transplantation in patients with immediate,slow,and delayed graft function[J].{H}TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS,2006,(1):42-45.
  • 3Solez K,Colvin RB,Racusen LC. Banff 07 classification of renal allograft pathology:updates and future directions[J].{H}AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION,2008,(4):753-760.
  • 4Krejci K,Zadrazil J,Tichy T. Sonographic findings in borderline changes and subclinical acute renal allograft rejection[J].{H}EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY,2009,(2):288-295.
  • 5Gao BS,Wang YT,Wang G. A more sensitive hallmark of acute rejection(AR) after renal transplantation:color doppler ultrasonography of renal pyramids[J].{H}Human Immunology,2011,(1):S72-S72.
  • 6Sutherland T,Temple F,Chang S. Sonographic evaluation of renal transplant complications[J].J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol,2010,(3):211-218.
  • 7Rifkin MD,Needleman L,Pasto ME. Evaluation of renal transplant rejection by duplex Doppler examination:value of resistive inde[J].{H}AJR American Journal of Roentgenology,1987,(4):759-762.
  • 8Lebkowska U,Janica J,Lebkowski W. Renal parenchyma perfusion spectrum and resistive index(RI)in ultrasound examinations with contrast medium in the early period after kidney transplantation[J].{H}TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS,2009,(8):3024-3027.
  • 9Seiler S,Colbus SM,Lucisano G. Ultrasound renal resistive index is not an organ-specific predictor of allograft outcome[J].{H}Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation,2012,(8):3315-3320.
  • 10Wang HK,Chou YH,Yang AH. Evaluation of cortical perfusion in renal transplants:application of quantified power doppler ultrasonography[J].{H}TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS,2008,(7):2330-2332.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部