期刊文献+

经椎旁肌间隙入路微创小切口在胸腰椎骨折手术的应用 被引量:12

Application of transparavertebral muscular interspace minimal invasive approach in surgery for thoracolumbar fractures
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨椎旁肌间隙入路微创小切口治疗胸腰椎体骨折的临床疗效。方法后路椎弓根钉系统内固定治疗胸腰段椎体骨折患者53例,按手术入路分为椎旁肌间隙入路(A组,28例)和后正中入路(B组,25例)两组。比较两组的手术相关资料。结果 A组手术时间、术中出血量、术后切口引流量、术后3d、1个月和6个月的VAS疼痛评分分别为(78.75±7.53)min、(97.86±37.76)ml、(95.71±34.90)ml、(3.28±0.90)分、(1.71±0.94)分和(1.57±0.92)分,明显低于B组的(85.80±6.87)min、(258.00±65.64)ml、(185.20±62.26)ml、(3.96±0.68)分、(2.28±0.89)分和(2.16±0.99)分(P<0.05);而两组后凸角(Coob角)纠正率和椎体塌陷纠正率相仿(P>0.05)。结论椎旁肌间隙入路微创小切口与后正中入路相比,具有手术野清晰、置钉容易、出血少、手术时间短等优点。 Objective To investigate the outcomes of internal fixation of vertebral pedicle screw via transparavertebral muscular interspace minimal invasive approach for thoracolumbar fractures. Methods Fifty-three patients with tboracolumbar vertebral fractures were operated via transparavertebral muscular interspace minimal invasive approach(group A, 28 cases) or via traditional posterior middle approach(group B, 25 cases). The surgical outcomes were compared. Results The operation time, operative blood loss, postopeative drainage, VAS scores on the 3rd day, 1st month and 6th month after surgery, corrected rate of Cobb's angle and vertebral body height in group A were (78.75±7.53) min, (97. 86±37.76) ml, (95.71±34.90) ml, (3. 28±0.90) points, (1.71±0.94) points and ( 1.57 ± 0. 92) points, which were significantly less than (85.80 ± 6.87) min, ( 258.00 ±65.64) m1,(185.20±62.26) ml, (3.96±0.68) points, (2.28±0.89) points and (2.16±0. 99) points in group B(P〈0. 05). There were no any significant differences in the correction rate of Cobb's angle and vertebral body height between two groups (P〈0. 05 ). Conclusion Compared to traditional posterior middle approach, transparavertebral muscular interspace minimal invasive approach for internal fixation of vertebral fractures has the advantages of easy manipulation, clear operative field, less hemorrhage, soft tissue damage and operation time.
出处 《江苏医药》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第10期1204-1206,共3页 Jiangsu Medical Journal
关键词 胸腰段骨折 手术入路 Thoracolumbar fracture Surgical approach
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献36

  • 1池永龙,徐华梓,林焱,黄其杉,毛方敏,倪文飞.微创经皮椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗胸腰椎骨折的初步探讨[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(21):1307-1311. 被引量:125
  • 2袁强,田伟,张贵林,刘波,行勇刚,李勤,胡临,李志宇.骨折椎垂直应力螺钉在胸腰椎骨折中的应用[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(4):217-222. 被引量:306
  • 3Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspinal sacrospinalis-splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1968, 50: 919-926.
  • 4Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H. Changes in serum creatine phosphokinase MM isoenzyme after lumbar spine surgery. Spine, 1997, 22: 1018-1023.
  • 5Thesleff S, Ward MR. Studies on the mechanism of fibrillation potentials in denervated muscle. J Physiol, 1975, 244: 313-323.
  • 6Watkins MB. Posterolateral bonegrafting for fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg(Am), 1959, 41: 388-396.
  • 7Moseley GL, Hodges PW, Gandevia SC. Deep and superficial fibers of the lumbar multifidus muscle are differentially active during voluntary arm movements. Spine, 2002, 27: E29-36.
  • 8Shindo H. Anatomical study of the lumbar muhifidus muscle and its innervation in human adults and fetuses. Nippon Ika Daigaku Zasshi, 1995, 62: 439-446.
  • 9Kawaguchi Y, Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lmnbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine, 1996, 21: 2683-2688.
  • 10Gejo R, Matsui H, Kawaguehi Y, et al. Serial changes in trunk muscle performance afler posterior lumbar surgery. Spine, 1999, 24: 1023-1028.

共引文献201

同被引文献118

  • 1范智魁.经椎旁肌间隙入路微创治疗胸腰椎骨折的观察[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2016,29(34):96-97. 被引量:1
  • 2张毅,钟德君.肌间隙入路结合伤椎置钉治疗胸腰段骨折34例分析[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(33):366-366. 被引量:1
  • 3李文生,陈永峰.椎旁肌间隙入路在治疗胸腰段骨折中的应用[J].医学信息(医学与计算机应用),2014,0(17):140-140. 被引量:2
  • 4Kawaguchi Y, Matsui H, Tsuji H .Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. A histologic and enzymaticanalysis. Spine. 1996;21 (8):941-944.
  • 5Wiltse LL, Bateman JG, Hutchinson RH, et al. The paraspina sacrospinalis- splitting approach to the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am.1968;50: 919-926.
  • 6吐尔洪江·吐尔迪,伍政疆.经肌间隙入路与正中常规切口入路植椎弓根钉治疗胸腰段骨折比较研究[J].中国保健营养(中旬刊),2013,23(8):157-157.
  • 7Talebian S, Hosseini M, Bagheri H, et al. Trunk muscle fatigue in subjects with a history of low back pain and a group of healthy controls measured by similarily index. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2011 ;24:17-22.
  • 8Kawaguchi , Yabuki S, Styf J, et al. Back muscle injury after posterior lumbar spine surgery. Topographic evaluation of intramuscular pressure and blood flow in the porcine back muscle during surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21: 2683-2688.
  • 9戴胡明,夏睿,杨家赵,等.椎旁肌间隙入路和传统后正中入路在治疗胸腰段骨折对比研究[C].//安徽省医学会骨科学第十三次学术会议论文集.2012:254.257.
  • 10Jiang XZ., Tian W, Liu B, et al. Comparison of a paraspinal approach with a percutaneous approach in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures with posterior ligamentous complex injury: a prospective randomized controlled trial.J int Med Res. 2012;40(4):1343-1356.

引证文献12

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部