期刊文献+

多层螺旋CT在小儿腹部神经母细胞瘤手术切除风险评估中的应用 被引量:2

Risk assessment of abdominal neuroblastoma resection using multi-slice computed tomography
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:应用多层螺旋CT(MSCT)在小儿腹部神经母细胞瘤手术前进行切除风险评估,尝试提出新的术前判断肿瘤可否安全切除的影像分级标准,从而探讨多层螺旋CT在辅助和指导小儿腹部神经母细胞瘤的手术治疗中的应用价值。方法43例患儿均行多层螺旋CT增强扫描,并接受手术治疗。根据影像资料,所有患儿腹部肿瘤与毗邻重要血管的关系均归类于按事先确定的标准分为A、B、C、D、E五类中的一类,结合实际手术所见,分别计算以相应组别标准作为可切除标准时,CT术前诊断的各统计指标。找出拥有相对最佳指标的组别,作为CT在术前诊断的划分可切和不可切的界限。结果43例患儿的所有纳入统计的血管数为473条,按其在CT中与肿瘤的关系分为A级283条、B级65条、c级32条、D级76条及E级17条。结合手术情况,运用SPSS17.O软件绘制接受者工作特征(ROC)曲线,B组作为可切除标准时,肿瘤不可切除的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确率分别为84.47%、89.73%、69.60%、95.40%、88.58%,因此将B组标准作为CT进行术前判断肿瘤可切除性最为合适。结论根据影像特点和手术情况所得的术前判断肿瘤可否安全切除的影像分级标准,以肿瘤包绕大血管超出周径1/2。 Objective To explore feasibility of using MSCT-assisted abdominal neuroblastoma resection and their assessment standard, as well as potential clinical values. Methods 43 patients as- sociated with neuroblastoma or ganglio-neuroblastoma in abdomen underwent preoperative MSCT. Based on imaging, they were classified into 5 types according to the relationship between the tumors and the important vessels. Then all patients underwent resection. Helical CT results were compared with intraoperative observation so as to find out the better cutoff point of respectability. Results 473 vessels were analyzed in this study. All the vessels were divided into 5 types, involving 283 vessels in grade A, 65 vessels in grade B, 32 vessels in grade C, 76 vessels in grade D and 17 vessels in grade E. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn according to the images and the opera- tions. When grade B was reagarded as the criteria for resectability of neuroblastoma in abdomen, sen- sitivity was 84. 47%, specificity was 89. 73 %, a positive predictive value was 69. 60%, a negative pre- dictive value was 95.40% and accuracy was 88. 58% for unrepeatability of tumors. Conclusions Once exceling more than half of vessel circumference in tumor, the tumor is not suggested to be resected completely.
出处 《中华小儿外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第6期437-440,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery
关键词 体层摄影术 螺旋计算机 神经母细胞瘤 危险性评估 Tomography spiral computed Neuroblastoma Risk assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Park JR,Eggert A,Caron H. Neuroblastoma:biology, progno sis, and reatment. Pediatr Clin North Am, 2008, 55 ( 1 ) : 97- 120.
  • 2Ceeehetto G, Mosseri V, De Bernardi B, et al. Surgical risk fac tors in primary surgery for localized neuroblastoma: the LNESG1 study of the European International Society of Pedi atric Oncology Neuroblastoma Group. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23 (33) : 8483-8489.
  • 3Cohn SL, Pearson AD, London WB, et al. The International Neuroblastoma Risk roup (INRG)staging system: an INRG task force report. J Clin Oncol, 2009,27 (2) : 289-297.
  • 4Zeman RK, Davros WJ, Berman P, et al. Three Dimensional models of the abdominal vasculature pictorial essay tmsed on helical CT: usefulness in patients with pancreatic neoplasms. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1994,162(6) : 1425-1429.
  • 5Alfidi RJ, Haaga JR, Havrilla TR, et al. Computed tomography of the liver. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 1976,127(1 ): 69-74.
  • 6宋庆轮,陈卫霞,宋彬,刘荣波,陈军法.MRI及多层螺旋CT多平面重建显示胆囊癌邻近结构侵犯[J].华西医学,2009,24(8):2110-2114. 被引量:4
  • 7I.oyer EM, Davd CI, Dubrow RA, et al. Vascular involvement in pancreatic adenocarcinoma= reassessmenl by thin section CT. Abdom Imaging, 1996,21 (3) : 202-206.
  • 8Lu DS,Reber HA,Krasny RM, et al. I.ocal staging of pancre atic cancer: criteria for unresectability of major vessels as re- vealed by pancreatic-phase, thin section helical CT. A JR Am J Roentgenol, 1997,168(6):1439 -1443.

二级参考文献10

  • 1张小玲,刘起旺,张辉,张锁旺,梁力.MRI、MRCP对原发性胆囊癌的诊断价值[J].临床放射学杂志,2005,24(8):707-710. 被引量:22
  • 2SCHWARTZ L H, BLACK J, FONG Y, etal. Gallbladder carcinoma: Findings at MR imaging with MR cholangiopancreatography[J]. Comput Assist Tomogr,2002,26(3) :405-410.
  • 3LEVIN B. Gallbladder carcinoma[J]. Ann Oncol, 1999,10 (4) : 129-130.
  • 4YAMAGUCHI K, CHIJIIWA S, SAIKI K, et al. Retrospective analysis of 70 operations for gallbladder carcinoma[J]. Br J Surg, 1997,84(2) :200-204.
  • 5TSENG J H, WAN Y L, HUNG C F, etal. Diagnosis and staging of gallbaldder carcinoma. Evaluation with dynamic MR imaging[J]. Clin Imaging,2002,26(3) :177-182.
  • 6SOYER P, GOUHIRI M, BOUDIAF M, et al. Carcinoma of the gallbladder: Imaging features with surgical correlation[J]. AJR, 1997,169(3) : 781-785.
  • 7CHAN K M, YEH T S, YU M C, et al. Gallbladder carcinoma with biliary invasion: clinical analysis of the differences from nonbiliary invasion[J]. World J Surg,2005,29(1) :72-75.
  • 8BENOIST S, PANIS Y, FAGNIEZ P. Long-term results after curative resection for carcinoma of the gallbladder[J]. Am J Surg, 1998,175(2) : 118-122.
  • 9YOSHIMITSU K, HONDA H, SHINOZAKI K, et al. Helical CT of the local spread of carcinoma of the gallbladder: Evaluation according to the TNM system in patients who underwent surgical resection[J]. AJR,2002,179(2) :423-428.
  • 10ITO M, MISHIMA Y, SATO T. An anatomical study of the lymphatic drainage of the gallbladder[J].Surg Radiol Anat, 1991,13 (2) : 89-103.

共引文献3

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部