期刊文献+

吉西他滨联合洛铂和地塞米松治疗非生发中心型弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的近期疗效观察 被引量:5

Short-term efficacy of gemcitabine combined with lobaplatin and dexamethasone regimen on non-germinal center B-cell diffuse large B cell lymphoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨GDL(吉西他滨、地塞米松、洛铂)与R-GDL、R-CHOP和CHOP治疗非生发中心型弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的近期疗效以及最佳治疗方案。方法:对确诊的非生发中心型弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤109例患者,24例应用R-GDL方案治疗,28例应用GDL方案,25例应用R-CHOP方案,32例应用CHOP方案。前瞻性的随机对照比较R-GDL、GDL、R-CHOP和CHOP方案治疗患者的近期疗效,并评估治疗安全性。结果:R-GDL组完全缓解(CR)15例,部分缓解(PR)6例,总有效率为87.5%(21/24);GDL组CR 8例,PR 7例,总有效率为53.6%(15/28),R-CHOP组总有效率为64.0%(16/25),CHOP组43.8%(14/32)。其中GDL组显著优于CHOP组,P=0.04;加用美罗华组较单纯化疗组差异有统计学意义,P值分别为0.006、0.045。GDL组1年的无进展生存率(57.1%)显著优于CHOP组(46.9%),P=0.04;含美罗华组显著优于单纯化疗组,P值分别为0.034、0.002。含洛铂的方案血小板下降明显,需预防性应用升血小板的药物,其肝肾心脏毒性较小,加或不加美罗华不良反应率无明显改变。结论:吉西他滨联合洛铂、地塞米松方案有效率比R-GDL、R-CHOP和CHOP方案治疗非生发中心型弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤略高,但骨髓抑制较重,在化疗的基础上增加美罗华能进一步提高疗效。 OBJECTIVE: This study was to compare the short-term efficacy of (R)-GDL,GDL, R-CHOP and CHOP regimens on Non Germinal center B cell diffuse large B cell lymphoma(non-GCB DLBCL) patients. To explore the opal real regimen for initial treatment. METHODS: A total 109 patients of non-GCB DLBCL were enrolled. According to dif ferent treatment regimens, the patients divided in four groups, including 24 patients by R-GDL, 28 patients by GDL, 25 pa tients by R CHOP and 32 patients by CHOP. Efficacy assessment was conducted after two cycles therapy with followed up the side effects. RESULTS: The total response rate in R-GDL group was 87.5%(21/24),among which complete responses(CR) was in 15 patients and partial responses (PR) in 6 patients: The total response rate in GDL group was 53.6%(15/28) among which CR was in 8 patients and PR was in 7 patients. The total response rate in R CHOP and CHOP groups were 64.0%(16/25),43.8%(14/32). The therapeutic efficacy was significantly better in GDL group than in CHOP group(P〈0.05) ,and combination group was better than GDL and CHOP group(P= 0. 005, P=0. 045). The l-year progression-freely survival rates were significantly higher in GDL group than that in CHOP group(P=0.04) ,com hination group was higher than that inGDL and CHOP groups(P=0. 034,P=0. 002). The major adverse events in GDL group were hematological toxicities and nausea/vomit and other adverse events were rare. The adverse events in comhina tion groups were similar to simple chemotherapy groups. CONCLUSIONS: GDL regimen increases the therapeutic efficacy on newly diagnosed patients with non-Germinal center B-cell diffuse large B cell lymphoma,but the thrombocytopenia was severer than CHOP groups. The use of rituximab can increase efficacy.
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2012年第9期694-697,共4页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 淋巴瘤 药物疗法 联合 治疗结果 lymphoma drug therapy, combination treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1陈愉,杜洪,胡维维,韩西群,贺莉,宋兰英,朱梅刚,赵彤.非霍奇金淋巴瘤365例WHO新分类的临床病理分析[J].诊断病理学杂志,2004,11(5):304-307. 被引量:32
  • 2Rosenwald A. Wright G, Chan WC, et al. The use of molecular profiling to survival after chemotherapy for different large B cell lymphoma[J]. N Engl J Med,2002,245(25) .. 1937-1947.
  • 3Hans CP,Weisenburger DD, Greiner TC, et al. Confirmation of the molecular classification of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by immunohistochemistry using a tissue microarray [J]. Blood, 2004,103 (1) : 275-282.
  • 4Cramp M, Baetz T,Couban S, et al. Gemeitabine, dexamethasone and cisplatin in patients with recurrent or refractory aggressive histology B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma:a phase II study by the national cancer institute of Canada clinical trials group (NCIC- CTG)[J~. Cancer,2004,101(8) : 1835-1842.
  • 5张明辉,张清媛,赵曙,马文杰,许家玲.吉西他滨联合洛铂治疗蒽环类及紫杉类耐药转移性乳腺癌的临床观察[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2010,17(19):1565-1567. 被引量:16
  • 6Cheson BD,Pfistner B,Juweid ME,et al. Revised response crite- ria for malignant lymphoma[J~. J Clin Oncol, 2007,25 (5) 579 586.
  • 7Alizadeh AA,Eisen MB,Davis RE,et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profilingEJ~. Nature,2000,403(6769) =503-511.
  • 8Jais JP,Haioun C,Molina TJ, et al. The expression of 16 genes related to the cell of origin and immune response predicts surviv- al in elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with CHOP and rituximab[J~. Leukemia, 2008,22 (10) = 1917 1924.
  • 9谢剑明,郭晓红,曹梦苒,张军一,罗荣城.GDP方案治疗难治性弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤的临床研究[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2010,15(2):150-152. 被引量:5
  • 10夏奕,李志铭,史艳侠,夏忠军,姜文奇,黄慧强.R-CHOP和CHOP方案治疗两种亚型弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的近期疗效[J].癌症,2009,28(2):178-182. 被引量:5

二级参考文献59

  • 1陆林,胡宗涛.吉西他滨联合奥沙利铂治疗老年晚期非小细胞肺癌观察[J].肿瘤防治杂志,2005,12(18):1415-1416. 被引量:2
  • 2石远凯,于燕霞.非霍奇金淋巴瘤治疗进展[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2006,11(7):481-485. 被引量:11
  • 3薄兰君,梁爱斌,刘班,陈毓华,王菲,金雪萍.DICE方案治疗难治和复发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效分析[J].癌症,2006,25(12):1553-1556. 被引量:10
  • 4蒋会勇,李慧灵,胡海,何滢,赵彤.弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤t(14;18)易位及bcl-2基因扩增的检测[J].中华病理学杂志,2007,36(2):84-89. 被引量:28
  • 5NCCN非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床实践指南(中国版)专家组.非霍奇金淋巴瘤临床实践指南(中国版)[EB/OL].2007[2008-06-11].http://www.cncc.org.
  • 6Alizadeh AA, Eisen MB, Davis RE, et al. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling [J]. Nature, 2000,403(6769) :503-511.
  • 7Rosenwald A, Wright G, Chan WC, et al. The use of molecular profiling to predict survival after chemotherapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [J]. N Engl J Med, 2002,346 (25) : 1937-1947.
  • 8Shipp MA, Ross KN, Tamayo P, et al. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma outcome prediction by gene-expression profiling and supervised machine learning [ J ]. Nat Med, 2002,8 ( 1 ) : 68-74.
  • 9Lossos IS, Czerwinski DK, Alizadeh AA, et al. Prediction of survival in diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma based on the expression of six genes [J]. N Engl J Med, 2004,350(18):1828-1837.
  • 10Coiffier B, Lepage E, Briere J, et al. CHOP chemotherapy plus rituximab compared with CHOP alone in elderly patients with diffuse large-B-cell lymphoma [J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 346 (4) : 235-242.

共引文献66

同被引文献59

  • 1郑文,勇威本,朱军,张运涛,王小沛,谢彦.肝脏非霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床分析[J].癌症,2004,23(z1):1451-1454. 被引量:7
  • 2周立强,孙燕,谭文勇,李陶,王琦路,冯凤仪,王金万,储大同,石远凯,李晔雄,孙云田,吕宁.非霍奇金淋巴瘤1125例临床病理分析[J].癌症进展,2006,4(5):391-397. 被引量:47
  • 3孙燕.内科肿瘤学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2003.994-995.
  • 4KE X, WANG J, GAO Z, et al. Clinical characteristics and prog- nostic analysis of Chinese patients with diffuse large B - cell lym- phoma[J]. Blood Cells MolDis, 2010,44(1): 55-61.
  • 5CHEAON B D, PF|STNER B, JUWEID M E, et al. Revised re- spouse criteria for malignant lymphoma[ J]. J Clin Onenl, 2007, 25 ( 5 ) : 579 - 586.
  • 6JAFFE E S, HARRIS N L, STEIN H, et al. World Health Organ- ization classification of turnouts. Pathology and genetics of turnouts of haematopoitetic and lymphoid tissues [ M ]. Lyo: IARC Press, 2008:119 - 189.
  • 7ZINZAN1 P L, MARTELLI M. MAGAGNOLI M, et al. How do patients with aggressive non - Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with third - generation regimens ( MACOP - B and F - MACHOP) fare. in the long-term? [J] Haematologica, 1999, 84( 11 ) : 996 - 1001.
  • 8SAND A A, AWED N M, ABDEL HAFEEZ Z M, et al. Prognostic value of immunohistochemieal classification of diffuse large B - cell lymphoma into germinal center B - cell and non - germinal center B-cell sublypes[J]. Saudi Med J, 2010, 31(2) : 135 -141.
  • 9ROSENWALD A, WRIGHT G, CHAN W C, et al. The use of mo- lecular profiling to survival after chemotherapy for different large B cell lymphoma[J]. N Engl J Med, 2002, 245(25) : 1937 -1947.
  • 10BERGLUND M, THUNBERG U, AMINI R M, et al. Evaluation of immunophenotype in diffuse large B - cell lymphoma and its im- pact on prognosis[J]. Mod Pathol, 2005, 18(8) : 1113 - 1120.

引证文献5

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部