摘要
韩愈为中古思想文化转型的重要人物,钱氏秉其"以变为常"之文学史观,于文本细读之中,推知昌黎之双向接受,并进而体察昌黎为诗文转折关捩原因之所在,同时秉同情了解之态度,于昌黎言行之不合处作平情之论。钱氏论韩出以札记形式,故而形式略觉零散,但细味之,则系统而有条理与钱氏解诗之范式有本末并照之趣,可由此而知钱氏谈诗之"一以贯之"者,并可于钱氏之性情作玄想之体会。
Han Yu was an important figure of ancient culture and thoughts transformation. Qian Hong-shu took a ＂flexible＂ literature historical view as his observation angel to infer the inter-influence of Han Yu then he tried to construe why and how Han could be a figure of Chinese literature history. Mr Qian＇s study could give a reasonable interpretation about Han Yu＇s words not matching his deeds. Qian＇s opinion on Han looked dispersed for its reading notes form, but in fact it is structured and harmony. When you know this, you have found a probably way to understand Qian and his poetic paradigm.
出处
《浙江工商大学学报》
2012年第3期64-76,共13页
Journal of Zhejiang Gongshang University
基金
教育部青年项目"中唐文儒思想与文学研究"(10YJC751052)
兰州大学2010中央高校基本科研业务项目(人文社科类)"宋儒身体诗学研究"(10LZUJBWZY054)
兰州大学文科基金项目"中唐文儒思想与文学研究"(LZUGH09015)
关键词
诗学范式
连类之法
文本细读
诗史互证
接受史
poetic paradigm
the category link way
reading close
mutul proof of history and poetry
receptive history
